GEOPAK VS Highway Capacity Software
As of 30 October 2026, Highway Capacity Software is named by 136 companies and GEOPAK by 113; GEOPAK skews to companies under 200 people (27% vs 27%), Highway Capacity Software to companies over 1,000 (40% vs 33%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: GEOPAK's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Highway Capacity Software rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- GEOPAK: 2–200 employees
- 27%
- Highway Capacity Software: 2–200 employees
- 27%
- GEOPAK: 1,000+ employees
- 33%
- Highway Capacity Software: 1,000+ employees
- 40%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.8 · 2.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | GEOPAK | share | Highway Capacity Software | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 1 | 1% | 4 | 3% | Highway Capacity Software |
| 11-50 employees | 8 | 7% | 10 | 7% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 21 | 19% | 23 | 17% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 24 | 21% | 29 | 21% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 22 | 19% | 15 | 11% | GEOPAK |
| 1001-5000 employees | 26 | 23% | 41 | 30% | Highway Capacity Software |
| 5001-10000 employees | 2 | 2% | 5 | 4% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 9 | 8% | 9 | 7% | even |
| Segment | GEOPAK | share | Highway Capacity Software | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 75 | 66% | 94 | 69% | Highway Capacity Software |
| Property & construction | 36 | 32% | 20 | 15% | GEOPAK |
| Automotive | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Health care | – | – | 7 | 5% | outside top 12 |
| Public, community & associations | – | – | 5 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing & industry | – | – | 5 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Consumer services & leisure | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Technology & software | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | GEOPAK | share | Highway Capacity Software | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 107 | 95% | 120 | 88% | GEOPAK |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Canada | 1 | 1% | 5 | 4% | Highway Capacity Software |
| Germany | 1 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| France | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| HK | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| ID | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | GEOPAK | share | Highway Capacity Software | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 422 | 69% | 403 | 67% | even |
| Construction and civil | 116 | 19% | 60 | 10% | GEOPAK |
| Product, program & project management | 5 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 3 | 0% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 2 | 0% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Real estate and property | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Healthcare support and caregiving | – | – | 11 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 8 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Healthcare clinical | – | – | 7 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Social care and community | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using GEOPAK →
Companies using Highway Capacity Software →
civil infrastructure water ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Highway Capacity Software is named by 136 companies in job postings and GEOPAK by 113; 10 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/geopak-vs-highway-capacity-software)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
GEOPAK vs Highway Capacity Software: questions
Which is more used, GEOPAK or Highway Capacity Software?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Highway Capacity Software (136) over GEOPAK (113). By website-and-DNS footprint, Highway Capacity Software (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses GEOPAK?
27% of GEOPAK companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 27% for Highway Capacity Software. 33% of GEOPAK companies have over 1,000 employees, against 40% for Highway Capacity Software.
Do companies run both?
10 companies name both in their postings, usually GEOPAK in marketing and Highway Capacity Software in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on GEOPAK or Highway Capacity Software. Start free, no card.