GEOPAK VS OpenRoads Designer
As of 30 October 2026, OpenRoads Designer is named by 297 companies and GEOPAK by 113; GEOPAK skews to companies under 200 people (27% vs 34%), OpenRoads Designer to companies over 1,000 (26% vs 33%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: GEOPAK's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, OpenRoads Designer rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- GEOPAK: 2–200 employees
- 27%
- OpenRoads Designer: 2–200 employees
- 34%
- GEOPAK: 1,000+ employees
- 33%
- OpenRoads Designer: 1,000+ employees
- 26%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.8 · 10.0
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | GEOPAK | share | OpenRoads Designer | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 1 | 1% | 7 | 2% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 8 | 7% | 26 | 9% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 21 | 19% | 69 | 23% | OpenRoads Designer |
| 201-500 employees | 24 | 21% | 72 | 24% | OpenRoads Designer |
| 501-1000 employees | 22 | 19% | 44 | 15% | GEOPAK |
| 1001-5000 employees | 26 | 23% | 49 | 16% | GEOPAK |
| 5001-10000 employees | 2 | 2% | 8 | 3% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 9 | 8% | 21 | 7% | even |
| Self-employed | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | GEOPAK | share | OpenRoads Designer | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 75 | 66% | 209 | 70% | OpenRoads Designer |
| Property & construction | 36 | 32% | 66 | 22% | GEOPAK |
| Automotive | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | 1 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | – | – | 9 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Technology & software | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Consumer services & leisure | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Health care | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing & industry | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | GEOPAK | share | OpenRoads Designer | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 107 | 95% | 244 | 82% | GEOPAK |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% | 8 | 3% | even |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 1 | 1% | 10 | 3% | OpenRoads Designer |
| Germany | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 6 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| France | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | GEOPAK | share | OpenRoads Designer | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 422 | 69% | 3,164 | 79% | OpenRoads Designer |
| Construction and civil | 116 | 19% | 468 | 12% | GEOPAK |
| Product, program & project management | 5 | 1% | 38 | 1% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 3 | 0% | 8 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 2 | 0% | 11 | 0% | even |
| Real estate and property | 2 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 1 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 1 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 12 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | – | – | 8 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 6 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using GEOPAK →
Companies using OpenRoads Designer →
civil infrastructure water ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
OpenRoads Designer is named by 297 companies in job postings and GEOPAK by 113; 96 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/geopak-vs-openroads-designer)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
GEOPAK vs OpenRoads Designer: questions
Which is more used, GEOPAK or OpenRoads Designer?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, OpenRoads Designer (297) over GEOPAK (113). By website-and-DNS footprint, OpenRoads Designer (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses GEOPAK?
27% of GEOPAK companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 34% for OpenRoads Designer. 33% of GEOPAK companies have over 1,000 employees, against 26% for OpenRoads Designer.
Do companies run both?
96 companies name both in their postings, usually GEOPAK in marketing and OpenRoads Designer in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on GEOPAK or OpenRoads Designer. Start free, no card.