Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · unit testing frameworks

Gherkin VS React Testing Library

As of 30 October 2026, React Testing Library is named by 335 companies and Gherkin by 241; Gherkin skews to companies under 200 people (37% vs 57%), React Testing Library to companies over 1,000 (20% vs 36%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Gherkin's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, React Testing Library rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Gherkin: 2–200 employees
37%
React Testing Library: 2–200 employees
57%
Gherkin: 1,000+ employees
36%
React Testing Library: 1,000+ employees
20%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.1 · 2.1
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
241companies name Gherkin
335companies name React Testing Library
0name both
503 · 716postings in 90 days, Gherkin · React Testing Library
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentGherkinshareReact Testing LibraryshareLeans
Self-employed62%51%even
2-10 employees115%4112%React Testing Library
11-50 employees2611%7522%React Testing Library
51-200 employees5222%7522%even
201-500 employees3515%4814%even
501-1000 employees2410%237%Gherkin
1001-5000 employees3916%4112%Gherkin
5001-10000 employees177%72%Gherkin
10,001+ employees3113%206%Gherkin
By industry
SegmentGherkinshareReact Testing LibraryshareLeans
Technology & software12853%20461%React Testing Library
Business & finance services6125%6519%Gherkin
Manufacturing & industry3012%185%Gherkin
Public, community & associations42%21%even
Media & content42%103%even
Automotive31%21%even
Commerce & trade31%154%React Testing Library
Consumer services & leisure31%72%even
Transport, logistics & rental21%41%even
Health care10%41%even
Property & construction10%––outside top 12
Utilities & infrastructure10%31%even
Hospitality & travel––10%outside top 12
By country
SegmentGherkinshareReact Testing LibraryshareLeans
United States12050%19257%React Testing Library
France2310%82%Gherkin
United Kingdom219%3510%even
Germany125%103%even
Spain115%––outside top 12
India62%227%React Testing Library
Canada52%93%even
Brazil42%31%even
Switzerland42%––outside top 12
Australia31%51%even
Italy31%––outside top 12
Netherlands31%––outside top 12
Poland––51%outside top 12
Singapore––51%outside top 12
Lithuania––41%outside top 12
United Arab Emirates––31%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentGherkinshareReact Testing LibraryshareLeans
Software engineering53570%89194%React Testing Library
IT operations & business systems669%81%Gherkin
Quality, safety & environment334%10%Gherkin
Engineering (non-software)314%91%Gherkin
Product, program & project management192%––outside top 12
Data & AI91%40%even
Finance & accounting20%––outside top 12
Design & UX10%10%even
General management & consulting10%––outside top 12
Sales10%10%even
Customer service & success––20%outside top 12
Unclassified––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

React Testing Library is named by 335 companies in job postings and Gherkin by 241; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/gherkin-vs-react-testing-library)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Gherkin vs React Testing Library: questions

Which is more used, Gherkin or React Testing Library?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, React Testing Library (335) over Gherkin (241). By website-and-DNS footprint, React Testing Library (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Gherkin?

37% of Gherkin companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 57% for React Testing Library. 36% of Gherkin companies have over 1,000 employees, against 20% for React Testing Library.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Gherkin in marketing and React Testing Library in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Gherkin or React Testing Library. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market