Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · ci cd

GitHub Actions VS Google Cloud Build

As of 30 October 2026, Google Cloud Build is named by 141 companies and GitHub Actions by 4,647; GitHub Actions skews to companies under 200 people (48% vs 43%), Google Cloud Build to companies over 1,000 (33% vs 25%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: GitHub Actions's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Google Cloud Build rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

GitHub Actions: 2–200 employees
48%
Google Cloud Build: 2–200 employees
43%
GitHub Actions: 1,000+ employees
25%
Google Cloud Build: 1,000+ employees
33%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.9 · 3.2
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
4,647companies name GitHub Actions
141companies name Google Cloud Build
0name both
13,645 · 451postings in 90 days, GitHub Actions · Google Cloud Build
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentGitHub ActionsshareGoogle Cloud BuildshareLeans
Self-employed641%21%even
2-10 employees3908%139%even
11-50 employees81518%2216%even
51-200 employees1,04522%2618%GitHub Actions
201-500 employees68515%1511%GitHub Actions
501-1000 employees47010%1611%even
1001-5000 employees60313%1813%even
5001-10000 employees1704%75%even
10,001+ employees4059%2216%Google Cloud Build
By industry
SegmentGitHub ActionsshareGoogle Cloud BuildshareLeans
Technology & software2,57755%8057%even
Business & finance services87619%2417%even
Manufacturing & industry3888%75%GitHub Actions
Media & content1674%75%even
Commerce & trade1112%54%even
Consumer services & leisure1002%21%even
Utilities & infrastructure942%32%even
Public, community & associations772%43%even
Health care611%––outside top 12
Transport, logistics & rental611%21%even
Property & construction521%21%even
Automotive391%––outside top 12
Hospitality & travel––21%outside top 12
Agriculture & forestry––11%outside top 12
By country
SegmentGitHub ActionsshareGoogle Cloud BuildshareLeans
United States2,80560%8057%GitHub Actions
United Kingdom4069%139%even
Germany2395%43%GitHub Actions
India1393%64%even
France1173%21%even
Canada1102%86%Google Cloud Build
Netherlands661%––outside top 12
Sweden631%54%Google Cloud Build
Australia561%21%even
Poland491%––outside top 12
Brazil471%––outside top 12
Switzerland441%21%even
Spain––32%outside top 12
Italy––21%outside top 12
Japan––21%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentGitHub ActionsshareGoogle Cloud BuildshareLeans
Software engineering11,32265%21739%GitHub Actions
Data & AI2,09412%16930%Google Cloud Build
IT operations & business systems1,83510%9517%Google Cloud Build
Engineering (non-software)3102%31%even
Product, program & project management1221%20%even
Quality, safety & environment1121%––outside top 12
Sales670%––outside top 12
Customer service & success340%––outside top 12
Unclassified260%––outside top 12
General management & consulting250%20%even
Design & UX110%10%even
Legal, compliance & risk110%––outside top 12
Hospitality and food service––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Google Cloud Build is named by 141 companies in job postings and GitHub Actions by 4,647; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/github-actions-vs-google-cloud-build)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

GitHub Actions vs Google Cloud Build: questions

Which is more used, GitHub Actions or Google Cloud Build?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, GitHub Actions (4,647) over Google Cloud Build (141). By website-and-DNS footprint, Google Cloud Build (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses GitHub Actions?

48% of GitHub Actions companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 43% for Google Cloud Build. 25% of GitHub Actions companies have over 1,000 employees, against 33% for Google Cloud Build.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually GitHub Actions in marketing and Google Cloud Build in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on GitHub Actions or Google Cloud Build. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market