GitLab CI/CD VS Harness
As of 30 October 2026, Harness is named by 163 companies and GitLab CI/CD by 2,802; GitLab CI/CD skews to companies under 200 people (50% vs 28%), Harness to companies over 1,000 (45% vs 26%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: GitLab CI/CD's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Harness rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- GitLab CI/CD: 2–200 employees
- 50%
- Harness: 2–200 employees
- 28%
- GitLab CI/CD: 1,000+ employees
- 26%
- Harness: 1,000+ employees
- 45%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.9 · 4.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | GitLab CI/CD | share | Harness | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 24 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 206 | 7% | 8 | 5% | GitLab CI/CD |
| 11-50 employees | 526 | 19% | 12 | 7% | GitLab CI/CD |
| 51-200 employees | 655 | 23% | 25 | 15% | GitLab CI/CD |
| 201-500 employees | 422 | 15% | 23 | 14% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 252 | 9% | 18 | 11% | Harness |
| 1001-5000 employees | 355 | 13% | 30 | 18% | Harness |
| 5001-10000 employees | 107 | 4% | 12 | 7% | Harness |
| 10,001+ employees | 255 | 9% | 31 | 19% | Harness |
| Segment | GitLab CI/CD | share | Harness | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 1,556 | 56% | 73 | 45% | GitLab CI/CD |
| Business & finance services | 530 | 19% | 49 | 30% | Harness |
| Manufacturing & industry | 308 | 11% | 10 | 6% | GitLab CI/CD |
| Media & content | 81 | 3% | 6 | 4% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 53 | 2% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 50 | 2% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 48 | 2% | 6 | 4% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 44 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 40 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 35 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 25 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 15 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | GitLab CI/CD | share | Harness | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 1,486 | 53% | 123 | 75% | Harness |
| Germany | 246 | 9% | 3 | 2% | GitLab CI/CD |
| United Kingdom | 182 | 6% | 13 | 8% | even |
| France | 170 | 6% | 2 | 1% | GitLab CI/CD |
| India | 96 | 3% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 64 | 2% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Poland | 55 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 52 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 38 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Singapore | 37 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 30 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Italy | 28 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| South Korea | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Colombia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | GitLab CI/CD | share | Harness | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 7,527 | 71% | 547 | 61% | GitLab CI/CD |
| IT operations & business systems | 1,136 | 11% | 84 | 9% | even |
| Data & AI | 655 | 6% | 74 | 8% | Harness |
| Engineering (non-software) | 288 | 3% | 60 | 7% | Harness |
| Product, program & project management | 65 | 1% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 54 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 26 | 0% | 21 | 2% | Harness |
| Customer service & success | 17 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 15 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 10 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Construction and civil | 7 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 6 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using GitLab CI/CD →
Companies using Harness →
ci cd ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Harness is named by 163 companies in job postings and GitLab CI/CD by 2,802; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/gitlab-ci-vs-harness)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
GitLab CI/CD vs Harness: questions
Which is more used, GitLab CI/CD or Harness?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, GitLab CI/CD (2,802) over Harness (163). By website-and-DNS footprint, Harness (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses GitLab CI/CD?
50% of GitLab CI/CD companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 28% for Harness. 26% of GitLab CI/CD companies have over 1,000 employees, against 45% for Harness.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually GitLab CI/CD in marketing and Harness in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on GitLab CI/CD or Harness. Start free, no card.