Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · version control code hosting

GitLab VS Mercurial

As of 30 October 2026, Mercurial is named by 163 companies and GitLab by 2,846; GitLab skews to companies under 200 people (49% vs 69%), Mercurial to companies over 1,000 (17% vs 28%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: GitLab's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Mercurial rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

GitLab: 2–200 employees
49%
Mercurial: 2–200 employees
69%
GitLab: 1,000+ employees
28%
Mercurial: 1,000+ employees
17%
Postings per company, 90 days
4.1 · 1.6
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
2,846companies name GitLab
163companies name Mercurial
0name both
11,554 · 263postings in 90 days, GitLab · Mercurial
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentGitLabshareMercurialshareLeans
Self-employed251%––outside top 12
2-10 employees1907%149%even
11-50 employees53919%5735%Mercurial
51-200 employees66223%4125%even
201-500 employees38113%1811%GitLab
501-1000 employees2559%64%GitLab
1001-5000 employees40314%127%GitLab
5001-10000 employees1134%74%even
10,001+ employees27810%85%GitLab
By industry
SegmentGitLabshareMercurialshareLeans
Technology & software1,46952%9961%Mercurial
Business & finance services52819%2515%GitLab
Manufacturing & industry34212%1710%even
Public, community & associations853%32%even
Utilities & infrastructure833%11%GitLab
Media & content753%64%even
Commerce & trade592%11%even
Consumer services & leisure542%64%even
Transport, logistics & rental381%11%even
Property & construction311%11%even
Automotive301%32%even
Health care271%––outside top 12
By country
SegmentGitLabshareMercurialshareLeans
United States1,45251%8552%even
Germany28210%53%GitLab
France1957%42%GitLab
United Kingdom1937%42%GitLab
India803%3018%Mercurial
Netherlands542%––outside top 12
Canada532%42%even
Poland512%––outside top 12
Switzerland401%––outside top 12
Sweden351%––outside top 12
Spain341%––outside top 12
Singapore341%––outside top 12
Romania––42%outside top 12
United Arab Emirates––32%outside top 12
Australia––32%outside top 12
Belgium––32%outside top 12
LB––21%outside top 12
Saudi Arabia––21%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentGitLabshareMercurialshareLeans
Software engineering8,82158%37679%Mercurial
IT operations & business systems1,89712%102%GitLab
Data & AI1,3189%82%GitLab
Engineering (non-software)6074%225%even
Product, program & project management3052%20%even
Sales2792%82%even
Customer service & success1281%31%even
Quality, safety & environment580%––outside top 12
Administration & office410%––outside top 12
Human resources370%––outside top 12
Research and science320%20%even
General management & consulting280%––outside top 12
Manufacturing and production––71%outside top 12
Arts media and entertainment––10%outside top 12
Design & UX––10%outside top 12
Education & training––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Mercurial is named by 163 companies in job postings and GitLab by 2,846; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/gitlab-vs-mercurial)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

GitLab vs Mercurial: questions

Which is more used, GitLab or Mercurial?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, GitLab (2,846) over Mercurial (163). By website-and-DNS footprint, Mercurial (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses GitLab?

49% of GitLab companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 69% for Mercurial. 28% of GitLab companies have over 1,000 employees, against 17% for Mercurial.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually GitLab in marketing and Mercurial in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on GitLab or Mercurial. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market