Google Agent Development Kit VS LangGraph
As of 30 October 2026, LangGraph is named by 1,785 companies and Google Agent Development Kit by 271; Google Agent Development Kit skews to companies under 200 people (32% vs 39%), LangGraph to companies over 1,000 (36% vs 46%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Google Agent Development Kit's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, LangGraph rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Google Agent Development Kit: 2–200 employees
- 32%
- LangGraph: 2–200 employees
- 39%
- Google Agent Development Kit: 1,000+ employees
- 46%
- LangGraph: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.9 · 3.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Google Agent Development Kit | share | LangGraph | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 6 | 2% | 34 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 16 | 6% | 132 | 7% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 22 | 8% | 250 | 14% | LangGraph |
| 51-200 employees | 49 | 18% | 312 | 17% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 28 | 10% | 234 | 13% | LangGraph |
| 501-1000 employees | 24 | 9% | 179 | 10% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 49 | 18% | 294 | 16% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 15 | 6% | 91 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 62 | 23% | 259 | 15% | Google Agent Development Kit |
| Segment | Google Agent Development Kit | share | LangGraph | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 132 | 49% | 1,003 | 56% | LangGraph |
| Business & finance services | 52 | 19% | 400 | 22% | LangGraph |
| Manufacturing & industry | 20 | 7% | 115 | 6% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 16 | 6% | 31 | 2% | Google Agent Development Kit |
| Media & content | 12 | 4% | 56 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 9 | 3% | 34 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 8 | 3% | 35 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 6 | 2% | 15 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 5 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Consumer services & leisure | 5 | 2% | 27 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 2 | 1% | 27 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 2 | 1% | 12 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | – | – | 18 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Google Agent Development Kit | share | LangGraph | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 160 | 59% | 1,092 | 61% | LangGraph |
| United Kingdom | 19 | 7% | 126 | 7% | even |
| France | 14 | 5% | 56 | 3% | Google Agent Development Kit |
| Canada | 12 | 4% | 50 | 3% | even |
| India | 8 | 3% | 62 | 3% | even |
| Germany | 7 | 3% | 93 | 5% | LangGraph |
| Switzerland | 5 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 5 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 4 | 1% | 24 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 4 | 1% | 23 | 1% | even |
| Poland | 4 | 1% | 20 | 1% | even |
| Norway | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 28 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 23 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 16 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Google Agent Development Kit | share | LangGraph | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 673 | 53% | 4,582 | 60% | LangGraph |
| Software engineering | 286 | 23% | 1,664 | 22% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 32 | 3% | 206 | 3% | even |
| Sales | 23 | 2% | 97 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 15 | 1% | 40 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 9 | 1% | 92 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 6 | 0% | 64 | 1% | even |
| Customer service & success | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 2 | 0% | 6 | 0% | even |
| Arts media and entertainment | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 14 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 11 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 8 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Google Agent Development Kit →
Companies using LangGraph →
llm app frameworks ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
LangGraph is named by 1,785 companies in job postings and Google Agent Development Kit by 271; 245 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/google-adk-vs-langgraph)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Google Agent Development Kit vs LangGraph: questions
Which is more used, Google Agent Development Kit or LangGraph?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, LangGraph (1,785) over Google Agent Development Kit (271). By website-and-DNS footprint, LangGraph (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Google Agent Development Kit?
32% of Google Agent Development Kit companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 39% for LangGraph. 46% of Google Agent Development Kit companies have over 1,000 employees, against 36% for LangGraph.
Do companies run both?
245 companies name both in their postings, usually Google Agent Development Kit in marketing and LangGraph in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Google Agent Development Kit or LangGraph. Start free, no card.