Google Cloud Functions VS Heroku
As of 30 October 2026, Heroku is named by 148 companies and Google Cloud Functions by 304; Google Cloud Functions skews to companies under 200 people (46% vs 66%), Heroku to companies over 1,000 (16% vs 31%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Google Cloud Functions's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Heroku rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Google Cloud Functions: 2–200 employees
- 46%
- Heroku: 2–200 employees
- 66%
- Google Cloud Functions: 1,000+ employees
- 31%
- Heroku: 1,000+ employees
- 16%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.4 · 2.0
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 8,751
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Google Cloud Functions | share | Heroku | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 6 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 17 | 6% | 21 | 14% | Heroku |
| 11-50 employees | 63 | 21% | 38 | 26% | Heroku |
| 51-200 employees | 59 | 19% | 39 | 26% | Heroku |
| 201-500 employees | 33 | 11% | 17 | 11% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 31 | 10% | 8 | 5% | Google Cloud Functions |
| 1001-5000 employees | 40 | 13% | 15 | 10% | Google Cloud Functions |
| 5001-10000 employees | 7 | 2% | 5 | 3% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 48 | 16% | 4 | 3% | Google Cloud Functions |
| Segment | Google Cloud Functions | share | Heroku | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 163 | 54% | 96 | 65% | Heroku |
| Business & finance services | 53 | 17% | 20 | 14% | Google Cloud Functions |
| Media & content | 19 | 6% | 6 | 4% | Google Cloud Functions |
| Manufacturing & industry | 17 | 6% | 4 | 3% | Google Cloud Functions |
| Commerce & trade | 10 | 3% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 10 | 3% | 1 | 1% | Google Cloud Functions |
| Public, community & associations | 7 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 6 | 2% | 10 | 7% | Heroku |
| Health care | 5 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 4 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 4 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Google Cloud Functions | share | Heroku | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 181 | 60% | 83 | 56% | Google Cloud Functions |
| United Kingdom | 21 | 7% | 13 | 9% | even |
| India | 16 | 5% | 13 | 9% | Heroku |
| Germany | 12 | 4% | 8 | 5% | even |
| Canada | 11 | 4% | 5 | 3% | even |
| France | 10 | 3% | 7 | 5% | even |
| Brazil | 6 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Poland | 6 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 6 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 5 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| PH | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Google Cloud Functions | share | Heroku | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 437 | 43% | 358 | 73% | Heroku |
| Data & AI | 290 | 28% | 9 | 2% | Google Cloud Functions |
| IT operations & business systems | 117 | 11% | 33 | 7% | Google Cloud Functions |
| Marketing & communications | 8 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 7 | 1% | 17 | 3% | Heroku |
| Engineering (non-software) | 5 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality and food service | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 2 | 0% | 12 | 2% | Heroku |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Design & UX | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Google Cloud Functions →
Companies using Heroku →
paas serverless ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Heroku is named by 148 companies in job postings and Google Cloud Functions by 304; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/google-cloud-functions-vs-heroku)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Google Cloud Functions vs Heroku: questions
Which is more used, Google Cloud Functions or Heroku?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Google Cloud Functions (304) over Heroku (148). By website-and-DNS footprint, Heroku (8,751 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Google Cloud Functions?
46% of Google Cloud Functions companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 66% for Heroku. 31% of Google Cloud Functions companies have over 1,000 employees, against 16% for Heroku.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Google Cloud Functions in marketing and Heroku in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Google Cloud Functions or Heroku. Start free, no card.