Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · paas serverless

Google Cloud Functions VS Supabase

As of 30 October 2026, Supabase is named by 347 companies and Google Cloud Functions by 304; Google Cloud Functions skews to companies under 200 people (46% vs 77%), Supabase to companies over 1,000 (5% vs 31%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Google Cloud Functions's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Supabase rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Google Cloud Functions: 2–200 employees
46%
Supabase: 2–200 employees
77%
Google Cloud Functions: 1,000+ employees
31%
Supabase: 1,000+ employees
5%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.4 · 1.8
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 3,624
304companies name Google Cloud Functions
347companies name Supabase
0name both
725 · 622postings in 90 days, Google Cloud Functions · Supabase
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentGoogle Cloud FunctionsshareSupabaseshareLeans
Self-employed62%309%Supabase
2-10 employees176%8123%Supabase
11-50 employees6321%13739%Supabase
51-200 employees5919%4814%Google Cloud Functions
201-500 employees3311%237%Google Cloud Functions
501-1000 employees3110%113%Google Cloud Functions
1001-5000 employees4013%82%Google Cloud Functions
5001-10000 employees72%51%even
10,001+ employees4816%41%Google Cloud Functions
By industry
SegmentGoogle Cloud FunctionsshareSupabaseshareLeans
Technology & software16354%18754%even
Business & finance services5317%7221%Supabase
Media & content196%206%even
Manufacturing & industry176%103%Google Cloud Functions
Commerce & trade103%72%even
Utilities & infrastructure103%10%Google Cloud Functions
Public, community & associations72%72%even
Consumer services & leisure62%195%Supabase
Health care52%82%even
Automotive41%––outside top 12
Hospitality & travel41%10%even
Transport, logistics & rental41%51%even
Property & construction––103%outside top 12
By country
SegmentGoogle Cloud FunctionsshareSupabaseshareLeans
United States18160%19957%Google Cloud Functions
United Kingdom217%257%even
India165%134%even
Germany124%3711%Supabase
Canada114%103%even
France103%41%Google Cloud Functions
Brazil62%––outside top 12
Poland62%41%even
Sweden62%––outside top 12
Spain52%51%even
Italy41%––outside top 12
Singapore31%82%even
Australia––41%outside top 12
Switzerland––41%outside top 12
Netherlands––41%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentGoogle Cloud FunctionsshareSupabaseshareLeans
Software engineering43743%51756%Supabase
Data & AI29028%10611%Google Cloud Functions
IT operations & business systems11711%303%Google Cloud Functions
Marketing & communications81%303%Supabase
Sales71%182%even
Engineering (non-software)50%182%even
General management & consulting30%––outside top 12
Hospitality and food service30%––outside top 12
Product, program & project management20%303%Supabase
Customer service & success10%253%Supabase
Design & UX10%40%even
Human resources10%––outside top 12
Arts media and entertainment––51%outside top 12
Business development & strategy––40%outside top 12
Administration & office––30%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Supabase is named by 347 companies in job postings and Google Cloud Functions by 304; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/google-cloud-functions-vs-supabase)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Google Cloud Functions vs Supabase: questions

Which is more used, Google Cloud Functions or Supabase?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Supabase (347) over Google Cloud Functions (304). By website-and-DNS footprint, Supabase (3,624 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Google Cloud Functions?

46% of Google Cloud Functions companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 77% for Supabase. 31% of Google Cloud Functions companies have over 1,000 employees, against 5% for Supabase.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Google Cloud Functions in marketing and Supabase in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Google Cloud Functions or Supabase. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market