Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · message brokers streaming

Google Cloud Pub/Sub VS RabbitMQ

As of 30 October 2026, RabbitMQ is named by 1,917 companies and Google Cloud Pub/Sub by 679; Google Cloud Pub/Sub skews to companies under 200 people (42% vs 49%), RabbitMQ to companies over 1,000 (26% vs 33%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Google Cloud Pub/Sub's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, RabbitMQ rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Google Cloud Pub/Sub: 2–200 employees
42%
RabbitMQ: 2–200 employees
49%
Google Cloud Pub/Sub: 1,000+ employees
33%
RabbitMQ: 1,000+ employees
26%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.9 · 2.6
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
679companies name Google Cloud Pub/Sub
1,917companies name RabbitMQ
129name both
1,971 · 4,952postings in 90 days, Google Cloud Pub/Sub · RabbitMQ
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentGoogle Cloud Pub/SubshareRabbitMQshareLeans
Self-employed101%241%even
2-10 employees457%1327%even
11-50 employees10616%35418%RabbitMQ
51-200 employees13119%45524%RabbitMQ
201-500 employees9614%27114%even
501-1000 employees6710%18710%even
1001-5000 employees9714%27614%even
5001-10000 employees294%784%even
10,001+ employees9814%1407%Google Cloud Pub/Sub
By industry
SegmentGoogle Cloud Pub/SubshareRabbitMQshareLeans
Technology & software37655%1,13259%RabbitMQ
Business & finance services13320%35318%even
Manufacturing & industry406%1186%even
Commerce & trade304%462%Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Media & content304%593%even
Utilities & infrastructure162%523%even
Consumer services & leisure142%342%even
Public, community & associations112%201%even
Transport, logistics & rental112%261%even
Automotive71%211%even
Health care41%191%even
Property & construction41%––outside top 12
Hospitality & travel––211%outside top 12
By country
SegmentGoogle Cloud Pub/SubshareRabbitMQshareLeans
United States42663%99252%Google Cloud Pub/Sub
United Kingdom467%1488%even
Germany315%864%even
France213%935%even
India213%724%even
Canada183%271%even
Poland132%452%even
Brazil101%523%even
Sweden101%––outside top 12
Australia91%––outside top 12
Spain91%211%even
Singapore81%––outside top 12
Netherlands––322%outside top 12
Belgium––251%outside top 12
Switzerland––211%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentGoogle Cloud Pub/SubshareRabbitMQshareLeans
Software engineering1,08042%5,54480%RabbitMQ
Data & AI92336%3305%Google Cloud Pub/Sub
IT operations & business systems1807%3615%even
Product, program & project management201%421%even
Engineering (non-software)171%741%even
Sales100%210%even
Customer service & success70%180%even
Human resources30%––outside top 12
General management & consulting20%50%even
Arts media and entertainment10%––outside top 12
Education & training10%––outside top 12
Logistics warehouse and transport10%––outside top 12
Unclassified––170%outside top 12
Marketing & communications––80%outside top 12
Construction and civil––60%outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment––40%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

RabbitMQ is named by 1,917 companies in job postings and Google Cloud Pub/Sub by 679; 129 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/google-cloud-pubsub-vs-rabbitmq)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Google Cloud Pub/Sub vs RabbitMQ: questions

Which is more used, Google Cloud Pub/Sub or RabbitMQ?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, RabbitMQ (1,917) over Google Cloud Pub/Sub (679). By website-and-DNS footprint, RabbitMQ (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Google Cloud Pub/Sub?

42% of Google Cloud Pub/Sub companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 49% for RabbitMQ. 33% of Google Cloud Pub/Sub companies have over 1,000 employees, against 26% for RabbitMQ.

Do companies run both?

129 companies name both in their postings, usually Google Cloud Pub/Sub in marketing and RabbitMQ in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Google Cloud Pub/Sub or RabbitMQ. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market