Google Cloud Run VS Heroku
As of 30 October 2026, Heroku is named by 148 companies and Google Cloud Run by 462; Google Cloud Run skews to companies under 200 people (46% vs 66%), Heroku to companies over 1,000 (16% vs 30%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Google Cloud Run's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Heroku rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Google Cloud Run: 2–200 employees
- 46%
- Heroku: 2–200 employees
- 66%
- Google Cloud Run: 1,000+ employees
- 30%
- Heroku: 1,000+ employees
- 16%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.7 · 2.0
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 8,751
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Google Cloud Run | share | Heroku | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 12 | 3% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 43 | 9% | 21 | 14% | Heroku |
| 11-50 employees | 79 | 17% | 38 | 26% | Heroku |
| 51-200 employees | 89 | 19% | 39 | 26% | Heroku |
| 201-500 employees | 58 | 13% | 17 | 11% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 41 | 9% | 8 | 5% | Google Cloud Run |
| 1001-5000 employees | 55 | 12% | 15 | 10% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 18 | 4% | 5 | 3% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 67 | 15% | 4 | 3% | Google Cloud Run |
| Segment | Google Cloud Run | share | Heroku | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 250 | 54% | 96 | 65% | Heroku |
| Business & finance services | 88 | 19% | 20 | 14% | Google Cloud Run |
| Manufacturing & industry | 28 | 6% | 4 | 3% | Google Cloud Run |
| Media & content | 21 | 5% | 6 | 4% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 19 | 4% | 3 | 2% | Google Cloud Run |
| Consumer services & leisure | 11 | 2% | 10 | 7% | Heroku |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 9 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 7 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 7 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | 6 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 6 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Google Cloud Run | share | Heroku | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 258 | 56% | 83 | 56% | even |
| United Kingdom | 33 | 7% | 13 | 9% | even |
| Germany | 27 | 6% | 8 | 5% | even |
| France | 21 | 5% | 7 | 5% | even |
| India | 14 | 3% | 13 | 9% | Heroku |
| Canada | 12 | 3% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Sweden | 12 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 11 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 10 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Spain | 9 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 9 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 6 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| PH | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Google Cloud Run | share | Heroku | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 579 | 37% | 358 | 73% | Heroku |
| Data & AI | 555 | 35% | 9 | 2% | Google Cloud Run |
| IT operations & business systems | 183 | 12% | 33 | 7% | Google Cloud Run |
| Sales | 17 | 1% | 17 | 3% | Heroku |
| Product, program & project management | 12 | 1% | 12 | 2% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 6 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 2 | 0% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 2 | 0% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Construction and civil | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Google Cloud Run →
Companies using Heroku →
paas serverless ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Heroku is named by 148 companies in job postings and Google Cloud Run by 462; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/google-cloud-run-vs-heroku)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Google Cloud Run vs Heroku: questions
Which is more used, Google Cloud Run or Heroku?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Google Cloud Run (462) over Heroku (148). By website-and-DNS footprint, Heroku (8,751 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Google Cloud Run?
46% of Google Cloud Run companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 66% for Heroku. 30% of Google Cloud Run companies have over 1,000 employees, against 16% for Heroku.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Google Cloud Run in marketing and Heroku in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Google Cloud Run or Heroku. Start free, no card.