Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · relational databases

Google Cloud Spanner VS Google Cloud SQL

As of 30 October 2026, Google Cloud SQL is named by 315 companies and Google Cloud Spanner by 112; Google Cloud Spanner skews to companies under 200 people (35% vs 43%), Google Cloud SQL to companies over 1,000 (34% vs 37%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Google Cloud Spanner's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Google Cloud SQL rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Google Cloud Spanner: 2–200 employees
35%
Google Cloud SQL: 2–200 employees
43%
Google Cloud Spanner: 1,000+ employees
37%
Google Cloud SQL: 1,000+ employees
34%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.5 · 2.2
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
112companies name Google Cloud Spanner
315companies name Google Cloud SQL
54name both
285 · 683postings in 90 days, Google Cloud Spanner · Google Cloud SQL
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentGoogle Cloud SpannershareGoogle Cloud SQLshareLeans
Self-employed22%62%even
2-10 employees22%217%Google Cloud SQL
11-50 employees1211%4213%Google Cloud SQL
51-200 employees2522%7223%even
201-500 employees2119%3712%Google Cloud Spanner
501-1000 employees98%3010%even
1001-5000 employees1513%4314%even
5001-10000 employees87%186%even
10,001+ employees1816%4615%even
By industry
SegmentGoogle Cloud SpannershareGoogle Cloud SQLshareLeans
Technology & software6861%17957%Google Cloud Spanner
Business & finance services2119%6822%Google Cloud SQL
Consumer services & leisure54%62%Google Cloud Spanner
Manufacturing & industry44%113%even
Commerce & trade33%144%even
Public, community & associations33%41%even
Media & content33%72%even
Transport, logistics & rental22%72%even
Automotive11%21%even
Property & construction11%––outside top 12
Utilities & infrastructure11%31%even
Health care––62%outside top 12
Hospitality & travel––52%outside top 12
By country
SegmentGoogle Cloud SpannershareGoogle Cloud SQLshareLeans
United States8071%20866%Google Cloud Spanner
United Kingdom44%175%even
Singapore44%62%even
Germany33%113%even
India33%103%even
Japan33%41%even
Poland33%62%even
Brazil22%––outside top 12
Australia11%52%even
Canada11%113%Google Cloud SQL
Colombia11%––outside top 12
Denmark11%––outside top 12
France––103%outside top 12
Italy––52%outside top 12
Spain––41%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentGoogle Cloud SpannershareGoogle Cloud SQLshareLeans
Software engineering18347%36439%Google Cloud Spanner
Data & AI7620%20222%Google Cloud SQL
IT operations & business systems5715%22625%Google Cloud SQL
Sales185%61%Google Cloud Spanner
Engineering (non-software)21%30%even
Logistics warehouse and transport21%––outside top 12
Product, program & project management21%71%even
Customer service & success10%30%even
General management & consulting10%––outside top 12
Unclassified10%––outside top 12
Construction and civil––30%outside top 12
Business development & strategy––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Google Cloud SQL is named by 315 companies in job postings and Google Cloud Spanner by 112; 54 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/google-cloud-spanner-vs-google-cloud-sql)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Google Cloud Spanner vs Google Cloud SQL: questions

Which is more used, Google Cloud Spanner or Google Cloud SQL?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Google Cloud SQL (315) over Google Cloud Spanner (112). By website-and-DNS footprint, Google Cloud SQL (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Google Cloud Spanner?

35% of Google Cloud Spanner companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 43% for Google Cloud SQL. 37% of Google Cloud Spanner companies have over 1,000 employees, against 34% for Google Cloud SQL.

Do companies run both?

54 companies name both in their postings, usually Google Cloud Spanner in marketing and Google Cloud SQL in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Google Cloud Spanner or Google Cloud SQL. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market