Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · relational databases

Google Cloud Spanner VS PostgreSQL

As of 30 October 2026, PostgreSQL is named by 9,372 companies and Google Cloud Spanner by 112; Google Cloud Spanner skews to companies under 200 people (35% vs 62%), PostgreSQL to companies over 1,000 (16% vs 37%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Google Cloud Spanner's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, PostgreSQL rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Google Cloud Spanner: 2–200 employees
35%
PostgreSQL: 2–200 employees
62%
Google Cloud Spanner: 1,000+ employees
37%
PostgreSQL: 1,000+ employees
16%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.5 · 3.0
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
112companies name Google Cloud Spanner
9,372companies name PostgreSQL
68name both
285 · 28,204postings in 90 days, Google Cloud Spanner · PostgreSQL
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentGoogle Cloud SpannersharePostgreSQLshareLeans
Self-employed22%2132%even
2-10 employees22%1,16312%PostgreSQL
11-50 employees1211%2,45126%PostgreSQL
51-200 employees2522%2,18123%even
201-500 employees2119%1,14412%Google Cloud Spanner
501-1000 employees98%6817%even
1001-5000 employees1513%8369%Google Cloud Spanner
5001-10000 employees87%2112%Google Cloud Spanner
10,001+ employees1816%4925%Google Cloud Spanner
By industry
SegmentGoogle Cloud SpannersharePostgreSQLshareLeans
Technology & software6861%5,54359%even
Business & finance services2119%1,68118%even
Consumer services & leisure54%2172%Google Cloud Spanner
Manufacturing & industry44%5506%PostgreSQL
Commerce & trade33%1812%even
Public, community & associations33%2082%even
Media & content33%2743%even
Transport, logistics & rental22%1141%even
Automotive11%701%even
Property & construction11%1211%even
Utilities & infrastructure11%2062%even
Health care––1291%outside top 12
By country
SegmentGoogle Cloud SpannersharePostgreSQLshareLeans
United States8071%5,18955%Google Cloud Spanner
United Kingdom44%6177%PostgreSQL
Singapore44%––outside top 12
Germany33%6437%PostgreSQL
India33%4044%even
Japan33%––outside top 12
Poland33%1612%even
Brazil22%981%even
Australia11%1101%even
Canada11%2162%even
Colombia11%––outside top 12
Denmark11%––outside top 12
France––3374%outside top 12
Italy––1462%outside top 12
Netherlands––1271%outside top 12
Switzerland––901%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentGoogle Cloud SpannersharePostgreSQLshareLeans
Software engineering18347%25,75564%PostgreSQL
Data & AI7620%4,75912%Google Cloud Spanner
IT operations & business systems5715%3,89710%Google Cloud Spanner
Sales185%2101%Google Cloud Spanner
Engineering (non-software)21%6542%even
Logistics warehouse and transport21%––outside top 12
Product, program & project management21%3741%even
Customer service & success10%2561%even
General management & consulting10%500%even
Unclassified10%820%even
Finance & accounting––750%outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment––750%outside top 12
Marketing & communications––580%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

PostgreSQL is named by 9,372 companies in job postings and Google Cloud Spanner by 112; 68 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/google-cloud-spanner-vs-postgresql)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Google Cloud Spanner vs PostgreSQL: questions

Which is more used, Google Cloud Spanner or PostgreSQL?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, PostgreSQL (9,372) over Google Cloud Spanner (112). By website-and-DNS footprint, PostgreSQL (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Google Cloud Spanner?

35% of Google Cloud Spanner companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 62% for PostgreSQL. 37% of Google Cloud Spanner companies have over 1,000 employees, against 16% for PostgreSQL.

Do companies run both?

68 companies name both in their postings, usually Google Cloud Spanner in marketing and PostgreSQL in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Google Cloud Spanner or PostgreSQL. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market