Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · api specs data formats

GraphQL VS ISO 20022

As of 30 October 2026, ISO 20022 is named by 202 companies and GraphQL by 3,097; GraphQL skews to companies under 200 people (55% vs 22%), ISO 20022 to companies over 1,000 (57% vs 24%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: GraphQL's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, ISO 20022 rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

GraphQL: 2–200 employees
55%
ISO 20022: 2–200 employees
22%
GraphQL: 1,000+ employees
24%
ISO 20022: 1,000+ employees
57%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.5 · 3.3
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
3,097companies name GraphQL
202companies name ISO 20022
0name both
7,674 · 668postings in 90 days, GraphQL · ISO 20022
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentGraphQLshareISO 20022shareLeans
Self-employed441%21%even
2-10 employees31010%115%GraphQL
11-50 employees73124%136%GraphQL
51-200 employees64921%2110%GraphQL
201-500 employees39113%2512%even
501-1000 employees2418%157%even
1001-5000 employees38112%4824%ISO 20022
5001-10000 employees873%199%ISO 20022
10,001+ employees2638%4824%ISO 20022
By industry
SegmentGraphQLshareISO 20022shareLeans
Technology & software1,78958%5929%GraphQL
Business & finance services55418%11557%ISO 20022
Manufacturing & industry2027%115%even
Media & content1104%31%GraphQL
Commerce & trade973%10%GraphQL
Consumer services & leisure742%21%even
Public, community & associations502%21%even
Health care431%––outside top 12
Utilities & infrastructure421%52%even
Transport, logistics & rental381%31%even
Hospitality & travel331%––outside top 12
Automotive311%10%even
By country
SegmentGraphQLshareISO 20022shareLeans
United States1,83959%9246%GraphQL
United Kingdom2147%2311%ISO 20022
Germany1705%199%ISO 20022
India1485%52%GraphQL
France732%126%ISO 20022
Canada702%84%even
Poland441%––outside top 12
Netherlands421%––outside top 12
Australia371%52%even
Sweden361%––outside top 12
Brazil351%––outside top 12
Singapore341%31%even
Switzerland––31%outside top 12
Denmark––31%outside top 12
Lithuania––31%outside top 12
Portugal––31%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentGraphQLshareISO 20022shareLeans
Software engineering8,34075%21426%GraphQL
Data & AI7277%172%GraphQL
IT operations & business systems5125%18923%ISO 20022
Product, program & project management1251%9411%ISO 20022
Engineering (non-software)1151%––outside top 12
Sales1101%111%even
Customer service & success691%51%even
Unclassified220%––outside top 12
Marketing & communications170%40%even
Quality, safety & environment160%––outside top 12
Design & UX130%––outside top 12
Arts media and entertainment100%––outside top 12
Finance & accounting––567%outside top 12
General management & consulting––111%outside top 12
Legal, compliance & risk––61%outside top 12
Business development & strategy––51%outside top 12
Manufacturing and production––40%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

ISO 20022 is named by 202 companies in job postings and GraphQL by 3,097; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/graphql-vs-iso-20022)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

GraphQL vs ISO 20022: questions

Which is more used, GraphQL or ISO 20022?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, GraphQL (3,097) over ISO 20022 (202). By website-and-DNS footprint, ISO 20022 (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses GraphQL?

55% of GraphQL companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 22% for ISO 20022. 24% of GraphQL companies have over 1,000 employees, against 57% for ISO 20022.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually GraphQL in marketing and ISO 20022 in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on GraphQL or ISO 20022. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market