Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · 3d modeling rendering

Grasshopper (Rhino) VS Rhinoceros 3D

As of 30 October 2026, Rhinoceros 3D is named by 733 companies and Grasshopper (Rhino) by 207; Grasshopper (Rhino) skews to companies under 200 people (42% vs 52%), Rhinoceros 3D to companies over 1,000 (24% vs 28%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Grasshopper (Rhino)'s script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Rhinoceros 3D rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Grasshopper (Rhino): 2–200 employees
42%
Rhinoceros 3D: 2–200 employees
52%
Grasshopper (Rhino): 1,000+ employees
28%
Rhinoceros 3D: 1,000+ employees
24%
Postings per company, 90 days
3.1 · 4.1
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
207companies name Grasshopper (Rhino)
733companies name Rhinoceros 3D
216name both
646 · 2,983postings in 90 days, Grasshopper (Rhino) · Rhinoceros 3D
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentGrasshopper (Rhino)shareRhinoceros 3DshareLeans
Self-employed10%61%even
2-10 employees157%618%even
11-50 employees3115%16022%Rhinoceros 3D
51-200 employees4120%15721%even
201-500 employees4522%11816%Grasshopper (Rhino)
501-1000 employees168%537%even
1001-5000 employees3316%9413%Grasshopper (Rhino)
5001-10000 employees73%233%even
10,001+ employees189%618%even
By industry
SegmentGrasshopper (Rhino)shareRhinoceros 3DshareLeans
Property & construction9043%20127%Grasshopper (Rhino)
Business & finance services5527%17223%Grasshopper (Rhino)
Manufacturing & industry2211%13318%Rhinoceros 3D
Consumer services & leisure84%335%even
Media & content73%213%even
Technology & software73%375%even
Utilities & infrastructure52%101%even
Automotive31%375%Rhinoceros 3D
Commerce & trade31%436%Rhinoceros 3D
Public, community & associations31%253%even
Health care21%––outside top 12
Agriculture & forestry10%––outside top 12
Hospitality & travel––112%outside top 12
Transport, logistics & rental––51%outside top 12
By country
SegmentGrasshopper (Rhino)shareRhinoceros 3DshareLeans
United States10852%39153%even
Germany178%618%even
United Kingdom157%507%even
Canada94%243%even
Netherlands73%243%even
Spain63%142%even
India52%193%even
Australia42%122%even
Switzerland31%––outside top 12
France31%203%even
Italy31%284%Rhinoceros 3D
Singapore31%––outside top 12
Austria––112%outside top 12
Greece––91%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentGrasshopper (Rhino)shareRhinoceros 3DshareLeans
Engineering (non-software)32533%68818%Grasshopper (Rhino)
Construction and civil24725%76220%Grasshopper (Rhino)
Design & UX9910%1,45038%Rhinoceros 3D
Quality, safety & environment222%221%even
Product, program & project management172%501%even
Data & AI111%221%even
Education & training81%221%even
Software engineering51%241%even
Sales40%––outside top 12
Administration & office30%––outside top 12
Agriculture and environment30%281%even
Research and science30%180%even
Unclassified––170%outside top 12
Manufacturing and production––150%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Rhinoceros 3D is named by 733 companies in job postings and Grasshopper (Rhino) by 207; 216 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/grasshopper-3d-vs-rhinoceros-3d)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Grasshopper (Rhino) vs Rhinoceros 3D: questions

Which is more used, Grasshopper (Rhino) or Rhinoceros 3D?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Rhinoceros 3D (733) over Grasshopper (Rhino) (207). By website-and-DNS footprint, Rhinoceros 3D (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Grasshopper (Rhino)?

42% of Grasshopper (Rhino) companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 52% for Rhinoceros 3D. 28% of Grasshopper (Rhino) companies have over 1,000 employees, against 24% for Rhinoceros 3D.

Do companies run both?

216 companies name both in their postings, usually Grasshopper (Rhino) in marketing and Rhinoceros 3D in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Grasshopper (Rhino) or Rhinoceros 3D. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market