Group Policy VS Jamf
As of 4 November 2026, Jamf is named by 1,090 companies and Group Policy by 1,679; Group Policy skews to companies under 200 people (32% vs 41%), Jamf to companies over 1,000 (29% vs 38%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Group Policy's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Jamf rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Group Policy: 2–200 employees
- 32%
- Jamf: 2–200 employees
- 41%
- Group Policy: 1,000+ employees
- 38%
- Jamf: 1,000+ employees
- 29%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.9 · 1.6
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 6,815
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Group Policy | share | Jamf | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 19 | 1% | 22 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 75 | 4% | 92 | 8% | Jamf |
| 11-50 employees | 151 | 9% | 116 | 11% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 303 | 18% | 239 | 22% | Jamf |
| 201-500 employees | 284 | 17% | 170 | 16% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 209 | 12% | 135 | 12% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 298 | 18% | 178 | 16% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 97 | 6% | 46 | 4% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 243 | 14% | 92 | 8% | Group Policy |
| Segment | Group Policy | share | Jamf | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 492 | 29% | 480 | 44% | Jamf |
| Business & finance services | 339 | 20% | 202 | 19% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 291 | 17% | 110 | 10% | Group Policy |
| Health care | 117 | 7% | 34 | 3% | Group Policy |
| Public, community & associations | 82 | 5% | 28 | 3% | Group Policy |
| Commerce & trade | 66 | 4% | 38 | 3% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 61 | 4% | 20 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 55 | 3% | 71 | 7% | Jamf |
| Property & construction | 52 | 3% | 17 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 39 | 2% | 48 | 4% | Jamf |
| Automotive | 34 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 33 | 2% | 21 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 13 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Group Policy | share | Jamf | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 1,053 | 63% | 768 | 70% | Jamf |
| United Kingdom | 84 | 5% | 92 | 8% | Jamf |
| Germany | 73 | 4% | 31 | 3% | even |
| France | 66 | 4% | 21 | 2% | Group Policy |
| Canada | 53 | 3% | 23 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 25 | 1% | 22 | 2% | even |
| Brazil | 23 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | 19 | 1% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Poland | 16 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 16 | 1% | 10 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 14 | 1% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Switzerland | 12 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Japan | – | – | 11 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 7 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Group Policy | share | Jamf | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 3,044 | 71% | 1,484 | 70% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 247 | 6% | 36 | 2% | Group Policy |
| Software engineering | 123 | 3% | 93 | 4% | even |
| Customer service & success | 107 | 2% | 58 | 3% | even |
| Sales | 62 | 1% | 36 | 2% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 40 | 1% | 34 | 2% | even |
| Procurement and purchasing | 32 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | 24 | 1% | 8 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 16 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 15 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 14 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 13 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Administration & office | 11 | 0% | 29 | 1% | even |
| Data & AI | 8 | 0% | 14 | 1% | even |
| Unclassified | 7 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Arts media and entertainment | 6 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 5 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Healthcare clinical | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Healthcare support and caregiving | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Facilities cleaning and security | 4 | 0% | 8 | 0% | even |
| Hospitality and food service | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 3 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 2 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Manufacturing and production | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Real estate and property | 2 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Research and science | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Public safety and protective services | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Group Policy →
Companies using Jamf →
endpoint management uem ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Jamf is named by 1,090 companies in job postings and Group Policy by 1,679; 94 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/group-policy-vs-jamf)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Group Policy vs Jamf: questions
Which is more used, Group Policy or Jamf?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Group Policy (1,679) over Jamf (1,090). By website-and-DNS footprint, Jamf (6,815 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Group Policy?
32% of Group Policy companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 41% for Jamf. 38% of Group Policy companies have over 1,000 employees, against 29% for Jamf.
Do companies run both?
94 companies name both in their postings, usually Group Policy in marketing and Jamf in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Group Policy or Jamf. Start free, no card.