Group Policy VS Kandji
As of 30 October 2026, Kandji is named by 202 companies and Group Policy by 1,218; Group Policy skews to companies under 200 people (31% vs 60%), Kandji to companies over 1,000 (13% vs 38%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Group Policy's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Kandji rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Group Policy: 2–200 employees
- 31%
- Kandji: 2–200 employees
- 60%
- Group Policy: 1,000+ employees
- 38%
- Kandji: 1,000+ employees
- 13%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.2 · 1.4
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Group Policy | share | Kandji | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 10 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 44 | 4% | 33 | 16% | Kandji |
| 11-50 employees | 114 | 9% | 31 | 15% | Kandji |
| 51-200 employees | 217 | 18% | 58 | 29% | Kandji |
| 201-500 employees | 206 | 17% | 38 | 19% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 163 | 13% | 15 | 7% | Group Policy |
| 1001-5000 employees | 220 | 18% | 22 | 11% | Group Policy |
| 5001-10000 employees | 69 | 6% | 1 | 0% | Group Policy |
| 10,001+ employees | 175 | 14% | 3 | 1% | Group Policy |
| Segment | Group Policy | share | Kandji | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 361 | 30% | 127 | 63% | Kandji |
| Business & finance services | 245 | 20% | 36 | 18% | Group Policy |
| Manufacturing & industry | 224 | 18% | 13 | 6% | Group Policy |
| Health care | 83 | 7% | 4 | 2% | Group Policy |
| Public, community & associations | 54 | 4% | 3 | 1% | Group Policy |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 51 | 4% | 3 | 1% | Group Policy |
| Commerce & trade | 40 | 3% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | 39 | 3% | 2 | 1% | Group Policy |
| Consumer services & leisure | 31 | 3% | 1 | 0% | Group Policy |
| Automotive | 28 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | 27 | 2% | 6 | 3% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 22 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Segment | Group Policy | share | Kandji | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 799 | 66% | 158 | 78% | Kandji |
| United Kingdom | 70 | 6% | 16 | 8% | Kandji |
| Germany | 58 | 5% | 1 | 0% | Group Policy |
| Canada | 45 | 4% | 6 | 3% | even |
| France | 45 | 4% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 22 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Sweden | 14 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| India | 13 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Poland | 13 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 11 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 10 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 10 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Czechia | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Finland | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Group Policy | share | Kandji | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 2,563 | 71% | 309 | 85% | Kandji |
| Engineering (non-software) | 201 | 6% | 4 | 1% | Group Policy |
| Software engineering | 99 | 3% | 17 | 5% | even |
| Customer service & success | 86 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 56 | 2% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 36 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | 24 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Procurement and purchasing | 22 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 12 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 11 | 0% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 11 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 10 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Group Policy →
Companies using Kandji →
endpoint management uem ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Kandji is named by 202 companies in job postings and Group Policy by 1,218; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/group-policy-vs-kandji)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Group Policy vs Kandji: questions
Which is more used, Group Policy or Kandji?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Group Policy (1,218) over Kandji (202). By website-and-DNS footprint, Kandji (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Group Policy?
31% of Group Policy companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 60% for Kandji. 38% of Group Policy companies have over 1,000 employees, against 13% for Kandji.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Group Policy in marketing and Kandji in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Group Policy or Kandji. Start free, no card.