Harness VS Travis CI
As of 30 October 2026, Travis CI is named by 101 companies and Harness by 163; Harness skews to companies under 200 people (28% vs 52%), Travis CI to companies over 1,000 (27% vs 45%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Harness's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Travis CI rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Harness: 2–200 employees
- 28%
- Travis CI: 2–200 employees
- 52%
- Harness: 1,000+ employees
- 45%
- Travis CI: 1,000+ employees
- 27%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 4.8 · 1.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Harness | share | Travis CI | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 4 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 8 | 5% | 7 | 7% | Travis CI |
| 11-50 employees | 12 | 7% | 20 | 20% | Travis CI |
| 51-200 employees | 25 | 15% | 26 | 26% | Travis CI |
| 201-500 employees | 23 | 14% | 13 | 13% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 18 | 11% | 7 | 7% | Harness |
| 1001-5000 employees | 30 | 18% | 17 | 17% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 12 | 7% | 2 | 2% | Harness |
| 10,001+ employees | 31 | 19% | 8 | 8% | Harness |
| Segment | Harness | share | Travis CI | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 73 | 45% | 67 | 66% | Travis CI |
| Business & finance services | 49 | 30% | 12 | 12% | Harness |
| Manufacturing & industry | 10 | 6% | 3 | 3% | Harness |
| Consumer services & leisure | 6 | 4% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 6 | 4% | 5 | 5% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 5 | 3% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Automotive | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 4 | 2% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 2 | 1% | 5 | 5% | Travis CI |
| Health care | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Harness | share | Travis CI | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 123 | 75% | 58 | 57% | Harness |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 8% | 7 | 7% | even |
| Canada | 4 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 3 | 2% | 3 | 3% | even |
| India | 3 | 2% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Australia | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 2 | 1% | 3 | 3% | even |
| South Korea | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 3 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 3 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Portugal | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| AF | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Argentina | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Harness | share | Travis CI | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 547 | 61% | 239 | 80% | Travis CI |
| IT operations & business systems | 84 | 9% | 33 | 11% | even |
| Data & AI | 74 | 8% | 7 | 2% | Harness |
| Engineering (non-software) | 60 | 7% | 2 | 1% | Harness |
| Sales | 21 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 9 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Social care and community | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Harness →
Companies using Travis CI →
ci cd ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Travis CI is named by 101 companies in job postings and Harness by 163; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/harness-vs-travis-ci)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Harness vs Travis CI: questions
Which is more used, Harness or Travis CI?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Harness (163) over Travis CI (101). By website-and-DNS footprint, Travis CI (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Harness?
28% of Harness companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 52% for Travis CI. 45% of Harness companies have over 1,000 employees, against 27% for Travis CI.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Harness in marketing and Travis CI in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Harness or Travis CI. Start free, no card.