Higgsfield VS Kling AI
As of 2 November 2026, Kling AI is named by 150 companies and Higgsfield by 130; Higgsfield skews to companies under 200 people (60% vs 49%), Kling AI to companies over 1,000 (17% vs 17%).
As of 2 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Higgsfield's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Kling AI rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Higgsfield: 2–200 employees
- 60%
- Kling AI: 2–200 employees
- 49%
- Higgsfield: 1,000+ employees
- 17%
- Kling AI: 1,000+ employees
- 17%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.7 · 2.6
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Higgsfield | share | Kling AI | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 8 | 6% | 10 | 7% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 15 | 12% | 10 | 7% | Higgsfield |
| 11-50 employees | 31 | 24% | 34 | 23% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 32 | 25% | 29 | 19% | Higgsfield |
| 201-500 employees | 15 | 12% | 25 | 17% | Kling AI |
| 501-1000 employees | 7 | 5% | 16 | 11% | Kling AI |
| 1001-5000 employees | 13 | 10% | 16 | 11% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 4 | 3% | 4 | 3% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 5 | 4% | 6 | 4% | even |
| Segment | Higgsfield | share | Kling AI | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 44 | 34% | 45 | 30% | Higgsfield |
| Technology & software | 37 | 28% | 41 | 27% | even |
| Media & content | 12 | 9% | 21 | 14% | Kling AI |
| Commerce & trade | 11 | 8% | 12 | 8% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 7 | 5% | 10 | 7% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 5 | 4% | 7 | 5% | even |
| Property & construction | 5 | 4% | 2 | 1% | Higgsfield |
| Health care | 3 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Public, community & associations | 1 | 1% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Automotive | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Higgsfield | share | Kling AI | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 65 | 50% | 77 | 51% | even |
| Germany | 17 | 13% | 11 | 7% | Higgsfield |
| India | 9 | 7% | 11 | 7% | even |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 4% | 9 | 6% | Kling AI |
| United Arab Emirates | 4 | 3% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 3 | 2% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Sweden | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| EG | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 2 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| TH | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Ukraine | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Higgsfield | share | Kling AI | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Design & UX | 151 | 38% | 157 | 34% | Higgsfield |
| Arts media and entertainment | 130 | 33% | 166 | 36% | Kling AI |
| Marketing & communications | 63 | 16% | 46 | 10% | Higgsfield |
| Product, program & project management | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 2 | 1% | 41 | 9% | Kling AI |
| Education & training | 2 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Human resources | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | 2 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Software engineering | 2 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Unclassified | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality and food service | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Higgsfield →
Companies using Kling AI →
generative media voice ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Kling AI is named by 150 companies in job postings and Higgsfield by 130; 67 name both. (Breaknorm, 2 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/higgsfield-vs-kling-ai)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Higgsfield vs Kling AI: questions
Which is more used, Higgsfield or Kling AI?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Kling AI (150) over Higgsfield (130). By website-and-DNS footprint, Kling AI (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Higgsfield?
60% of Higgsfield companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 49% for Kling AI. 17% of Higgsfield companies have over 1,000 employees, against 17% for Kling AI.
Do companies run both?
67 companies name both in their postings, usually Higgsfield in marketing and Kling AI in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Higgsfield or Kling AI. Start free, no card.