HTTP Live Streaming VS SIP
As of 30 October 2026, SIP is named by 449 companies and HTTP Live Streaming by 211; HTTP Live Streaming skews to companies under 200 people (51% vs 47%), SIP to companies over 1,000 (32% vs 28%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: HTTP Live Streaming's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, SIP rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- HTTP Live Streaming: 2–200 employees
- 51%
- SIP: 2–200 employees
- 47%
- HTTP Live Streaming: 1,000+ employees
- 28%
- SIP: 1,000+ employees
- 32%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.5 · 3.0
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | HTTP Live Streaming | share | SIP | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 27 | 13% | 42 | 9% | HTTP Live Streaming |
| 11-50 employees | 37 | 18% | 70 | 16% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 43 | 20% | 99 | 22% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 25 | 12% | 55 | 12% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 17 | 8% | 36 | 8% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 34 | 16% | 64 | 14% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 10 | 5% | 28 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 15 | 7% | 51 | 11% | SIP |
| Segment | HTTP Live Streaming | share | SIP | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 56 | 27% | 248 | 55% | SIP |
| Property & construction | 36 | 17% | 7 | 2% | HTTP Live Streaming |
| Business & finance services | 34 | 16% | 54 | 12% | HTTP Live Streaming |
| Manufacturing & industry | 34 | 16% | 31 | 7% | HTTP Live Streaming |
| Media & content | 24 | 11% | 11 | 2% | HTTP Live Streaming |
| Consumer services & leisure | 7 | 3% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 7 | 3% | 54 | 12% | SIP |
| Public, community & associations | 6 | 3% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 3 | 1% | 13 | 3% | even |
| Automotive | 2 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 2 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | HTTP Live Streaming | share | SIP | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 102 | 48% | 268 | 60% | SIP |
| Germany | 57 | 27% | 24 | 5% | HTTP Live Streaming |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 5% | 25 | 6% | even |
| France | 6 | 3% | 17 | 4% | even |
| Austria | 5 | 2% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Canada | 4 | 2% | 18 | 4% | SIP |
| India | 4 | 2% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Sweden | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Czechia | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 2 | 1% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Singapore | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 8 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 8 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | HTTP Live Streaming | share | SIP | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 278 | 37% | 349 | 19% | HTTP Live Streaming |
| Engineering (non-software) | 173 | 23% | 226 | 12% | HTTP Live Streaming |
| Skilled trades and field service | 52 | 7% | 22 | 1% | HTTP Live Streaming |
| Construction and civil | 27 | 4% | 5 | 0% | HTTP Live Streaming |
| Data & AI | 26 | 3% | 44 | 2% | even |
| Sales | 23 | 3% | 67 | 4% | even |
| Arts media and entertainment | 21 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 12 | 2% | 496 | 27% | SIP |
| Product, program & project management | 9 | 1% | 38 | 2% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 7 | 1% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 4 | 1% | 85 | 5% | SIP |
| Research and science | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using HTTP Live Streaming →
Companies using SIP →
network protocols ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
SIP is named by 449 companies in job postings and HTTP Live Streaming by 211; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/http-live-streaming-vs-sip)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
HTTP Live Streaming vs SIP: questions
Which is more used, HTTP Live Streaming or SIP?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, SIP (449) over HTTP Live Streaming (211). By website-and-DNS footprint, SIP (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses HTTP Live Streaming?
51% of HTTP Live Streaming companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 47% for SIP. 28% of HTTP Live Streaming companies have over 1,000 employees, against 32% for SIP.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually HTTP Live Streaming in marketing and SIP in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on HTTP Live Streaming or SIP. Start free, no card.