Hugging Face PEFT VS TensorFlow
As of 30 October 2026, TensorFlow is named by 3,290 companies and Hugging Face PEFT by 155; Hugging Face PEFT skews to companies under 200 people (46% vs 54%), TensorFlow to companies over 1,000 (25% vs 36%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Hugging Face PEFT's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, TensorFlow rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Hugging Face PEFT: 2–200 employees
- 46%
- TensorFlow: 2–200 employees
- 54%
- Hugging Face PEFT: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- TensorFlow: 1,000+ employees
- 25%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.8 · 2.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Hugging Face PEFT | share | TensorFlow | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 1% | 59 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 15 | 10% | 395 | 12% | TensorFlow |
| 11-50 employees | 24 | 15% | 715 | 22% | TensorFlow |
| 51-200 employees | 32 | 21% | 659 | 20% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 16 | 10% | 380 | 12% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 11 | 7% | 250 | 8% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 29 | 19% | 384 | 12% | Hugging Face PEFT |
| 5001-10000 employees | 11 | 7% | 112 | 3% | Hugging Face PEFT |
| 10,001+ employees | 16 | 10% | 336 | 10% | even |
| Segment | Hugging Face PEFT | share | TensorFlow | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 104 | 67% | 1,728 | 53% | Hugging Face PEFT |
| Business & finance services | 24 | 15% | 541 | 16% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 6 | 4% | 415 | 13% | TensorFlow |
| Media & content | 6 | 4% | 109 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 5 | 3% | 106 | 3% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 5 | 3% | 68 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 2 | 1% | 105 | 3% | even |
| Health care | 2 | 1% | 45 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 1 | 1% | 40 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | – | – | 60 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 30 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | – | – | 29 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Hugging Face PEFT | share | TensorFlow | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 105 | 68% | 1,993 | 61% | Hugging Face PEFT |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 8% | 207 | 6% | even |
| India | 7 | 5% | 184 | 6% | even |
| Switzerland | 4 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 4 | 3% | 33 | 1% | even |
| Germany | 3 | 2% | 155 | 5% | TensorFlow |
| Italy | 3 | 2% | 37 | 1% | even |
| France | 2 | 1% | 90 | 3% | even |
| Singapore | 2 | 1% | 36 | 1% | even |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | 35 | 1% | even |
| Canada | 1 | 1% | 86 | 3% | even |
| Cyprus | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 41 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 39 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Hugging Face PEFT | share | TensorFlow | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 464 | 85% | 9,358 | 71% | Hugging Face PEFT |
| Software engineering | 38 | 7% | 1,255 | 9% | TensorFlow |
| General management & consulting | 2 | 0% | 70 | 1% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 2 | 0% | 227 | 2% | even |
| Education & training | 1 | 0% | 48 | 0% | even |
| Research and science | 1 | 0% | 212 | 2% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | – | – | 317 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 111 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 97 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | – | – | 82 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 47 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 30 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Hugging Face PEFT →
Companies using TensorFlow →
ml frameworks ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
TensorFlow is named by 3,290 companies in job postings and Hugging Face PEFT by 155; 136 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/hugging-face-peft-vs-tensorflow)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Hugging Face PEFT vs TensorFlow: questions
Which is more used, Hugging Face PEFT or TensorFlow?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, TensorFlow (3,290) over Hugging Face PEFT (155). By website-and-DNS footprint, TensorFlow (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Hugging Face PEFT?
46% of Hugging Face PEFT companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 54% for TensorFlow. 36% of Hugging Face PEFT companies have over 1,000 employees, against 25% for TensorFlow.
Do companies run both?
136 companies name both in their postings, usually Hugging Face PEFT in marketing and TensorFlow in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Hugging Face PEFT or TensorFlow. Start free, no card.