Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · ml frameworks

Hugging Face Transformers VS Keras

As of 30 October 2026, Keras is named by 464 companies and Hugging Face Transformers by 449; Hugging Face Transformers skews to companies under 200 people (45% vs 50%), Keras to companies over 1,000 (31% vs 31%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Hugging Face Transformers's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Keras rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Hugging Face Transformers: 2–200 employees
45%
Keras: 2–200 employees
50%
Hugging Face Transformers: 1,000+ employees
31%
Keras: 1,000+ employees
31%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.2 · 2.4
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
449companies name Hugging Face Transformers
464companies name Keras
74name both
1,006 · 1,107postings in 90 days, Hugging Face Transformers · Keras
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentHugging Face TransformersshareKerasshareLeans
Self-employed164%61%Hugging Face Transformers
2-10 employees429%378%even
11-50 employees7617%11024%Keras
51-200 employees8619%8719%even
201-500 employees4911%5211%even
501-1000 employees429%266%Hugging Face Transformers
1001-5000 employees6615%5211%Hugging Face Transformers
5001-10000 employees184%194%even
10,001+ employees5412%7516%Keras
By industry
SegmentHugging Face TransformersshareKerasshareLeans
Technology & software26860%23851%Hugging Face Transformers
Business & finance services7416%6915%even
Manufacturing & industry337%6915%Keras
Public, community & associations225%153%even
Media & content204%174%even
Consumer services & leisure133%225%even
Utilities & infrastructure82%61%even
Commerce & trade51%72%even
Automotive41%31%even
Health care10%102%even
Transport, logistics & rental10%41%even
Property & construction––31%outside top 12
By country
SegmentHugging Face TransformersshareKerasshareLeans
United States28864%28461%Hugging Face Transformers
India286%266%even
Germany245%174%even
United Kingdom225%276%even
France102%82%even
Canada92%123%even
Singapore92%72%even
Spain72%61%even
Italy61%61%even
Romania41%––outside top 12
United Arab Emirates31%––outside top 12
Belgium31%––outside top 12
Poland––72%outside top 12
Australia––61%outside top 12
Netherlands––61%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentHugging Face TransformersshareKerasshareLeans
Data & AI1,10477%1,13871%Hugging Face Transformers
Software engineering1017%1167%even
IT operations & business systems232%60%even
Research and science191%181%even
Engineering (non-software)151%201%even
Legal, compliance & risk91%121%even
Sales91%––outside top 12
Marketing & communications50%––outside top 12
Product, program & project management50%81%even
Finance & accounting40%––outside top 12
General management & consulting40%111%even
Design & UX30%161%even
Unclassified––403%outside top 12
Education & training––111%outside top 12
Arts media and entertainment––60%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Keras is named by 464 companies in job postings and Hugging Face Transformers by 449; 74 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/hugging-face-transformers-vs-keras)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Hugging Face Transformers vs Keras: questions

Which is more used, Hugging Face Transformers or Keras?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Keras (464) over Hugging Face Transformers (449). By website-and-DNS footprint, Keras (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Hugging Face Transformers?

45% of Hugging Face Transformers companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 50% for Keras. 31% of Hugging Face Transformers companies have over 1,000 employees, against 31% for Keras.

Do companies run both?

74 companies name both in their postings, usually Hugging Face Transformers in marketing and Keras in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Hugging Face Transformers or Keras. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market