Hugging Face VS LiteLLM
As of 30 October 2026, LiteLLM is named by 130 companies and Hugging Face by 896; Hugging Face skews to companies under 200 people (47% vs 31%), LiteLLM to companies over 1,000 (34% vs 30%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Hugging Face's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, LiteLLM rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Hugging Face: 2–200 employees
- 47%
- LiteLLM: 2–200 employees
- 31%
- Hugging Face: 1,000+ employees
- 30%
- LiteLLM: 1,000+ employees
- 34%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.1 · 2.6
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Hugging Face | share | LiteLLM | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 23 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| 2-10 employees | 95 | 11% | 6 | 5% | Hugging Face |
| 11-50 employees | 155 | 17% | 13 | 10% | Hugging Face |
| 51-200 employees | 173 | 19% | 21 | 16% | Hugging Face |
| 201-500 employees | 102 | 11% | 24 | 18% | LiteLLM |
| 501-1000 employees | 75 | 8% | 22 | 17% | LiteLLM |
| 1001-5000 employees | 133 | 15% | 26 | 20% | LiteLLM |
| 5001-10000 employees | 38 | 4% | 9 | 7% | LiteLLM |
| 10,001+ employees | 102 | 11% | 9 | 7% | Hugging Face |
| Segment | Hugging Face | share | LiteLLM | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 522 | 58% | 63 | 48% | Hugging Face |
| Business & finance services | 147 | 16% | 24 | 18% | LiteLLM |
| Manufacturing & industry | 59 | 7% | 7 | 5% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 35 | 4% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 33 | 4% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Media & content | 29 | 3% | 12 | 9% | LiteLLM |
| Commerce & trade | 16 | 2% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 15 | 2% | 6 | 5% | LiteLLM |
| Health care | 13 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 10 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 9 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Hugging Face | share | LiteLLM | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 583 | 65% | 76 | 58% | Hugging Face |
| United Kingdom | 57 | 6% | 7 | 5% | even |
| India | 43 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 41 | 5% | 7 | 5% | even |
| France | 31 | 3% | 8 | 6% | LiteLLM |
| Canada | 17 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Switzerland | 11 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 9 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 9 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 6 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 5 | 1% | 5 | 4% | LiteLLM |
| Austria | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Finland | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Hugging Face | share | LiteLLM | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 2,415 | 66% | 213 | 49% | Hugging Face |
| Software engineering | 432 | 12% | 134 | 31% | LiteLLM |
| IT operations & business systems | 134 | 4% | 19 | 4% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 65 | 2% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 51 | 1% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 50 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 42 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 23 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | 18 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | 15 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 15 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 13 | 0% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Design & UX | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Hugging Face →
Companies using LiteLLM →
model serving gateways ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
LiteLLM is named by 130 companies in job postings and Hugging Face by 896; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/hugging-face-vs-litellm)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Hugging Face vs LiteLLM: questions
Which is more used, Hugging Face or LiteLLM?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Hugging Face (896) over LiteLLM (130). By website-and-DNS footprint, LiteLLM (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Hugging Face?
47% of Hugging Face companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 31% for LiteLLM. 30% of Hugging Face companies have over 1,000 employees, against 34% for LiteLLM.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Hugging Face in marketing and LiteLLM in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Hugging Face or LiteLLM. Start free, no card.