IBM DOORS VS MagicDraw
As of 30 October 2026, MagicDraw is named by 120 companies and IBM DOORS by 487; IBM DOORS skews to companies under 200 people (38% vs 43%), MagicDraw to companies over 1,000 (33% vs 36%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: IBM DOORS's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, MagicDraw rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- IBM DOORS: 2–200 employees
- 38%
- MagicDraw: 2–200 employees
- 43%
- IBM DOORS: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- MagicDraw: 1,000+ employees
- 33%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 7.4 · 5.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | IBM DOORS | share | MagicDraw | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 6 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 30 | 6% | 6 | 5% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 62 | 13% | 17 | 14% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 93 | 19% | 28 | 23% | MagicDraw |
| 201-500 employees | 73 | 15% | 22 | 18% | MagicDraw |
| 501-1000 employees | 47 | 10% | 6 | 5% | IBM DOORS |
| 1001-5000 employees | 65 | 13% | 18 | 15% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 30 | 6% | 4 | 3% | IBM DOORS |
| 10,001+ employees | 81 | 17% | 18 | 15% | even |
| Segment | IBM DOORS | share | MagicDraw | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 223 | 46% | 51 | 43% | IBM DOORS |
| Technology & software | 88 | 18% | 32 | 27% | MagicDraw |
| Business & finance services | 83 | 17% | 20 | 17% | even |
| Automotive | 38 | 8% | 4 | 3% | IBM DOORS |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 13 | 3% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Property & construction | 12 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 9 | 2% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Media & content | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 6 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Segment | IBM DOORS | share | MagicDraw | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 285 | 59% | 103 | 86% | MagicDraw |
| Germany | 50 | 10% | 4 | 3% | IBM DOORS |
| United Kingdom | 39 | 8% | 5 | 4% | IBM DOORS |
| France | 24 | 5% | 2 | 2% | IBM DOORS |
| Canada | 15 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Spain | 10 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Sweden | 8 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | IBM DOORS | share | MagicDraw | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 2,907 | 65% | 641 | 77% | MagicDraw |
| Software engineering | 516 | 12% | 57 | 7% | IBM DOORS |
| IT operations & business systems | 186 | 4% | 38 | 5% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 117 | 3% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 81 | 2% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 26 | 1% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Administration & office | 23 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 10 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | 8 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | 6 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Arts media and entertainment | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 5 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using IBM DOORS →
Companies using MagicDraw →
requirements mbse ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
MagicDraw is named by 120 companies in job postings and IBM DOORS by 487; 90 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/ibm-doors-vs-magicdraw)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
IBM DOORS vs MagicDraw: questions
Which is more used, IBM DOORS or MagicDraw?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, IBM DOORS (487) over MagicDraw (120). By website-and-DNS footprint, MagicDraw (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses IBM DOORS?
38% of IBM DOORS companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 43% for MagicDraw. 36% of IBM DOORS companies have over 1,000 employees, against 33% for MagicDraw.
Do companies run both?
90 companies name both in their postings, usually IBM DOORS in marketing and MagicDraw in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on IBM DOORS or MagicDraw. Start free, no card.