IBM DOORS VS Polarion
As of 30 October 2026, Polarion is named by 234 companies and IBM DOORS by 487; IBM DOORS skews to companies under 200 people (38% vs 33%), Polarion to companies over 1,000 (44% vs 36%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: IBM DOORS's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Polarion rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- IBM DOORS: 2–200 employees
- 38%
- Polarion: 2–200 employees
- 33%
- IBM DOORS: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- Polarion: 1,000+ employees
- 44%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 7.4 · 3.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | IBM DOORS | share | Polarion | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 6 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 30 | 6% | 15 | 6% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 62 | 13% | 24 | 10% | IBM DOORS |
| 51-200 employees | 93 | 19% | 39 | 17% | IBM DOORS |
| 201-500 employees | 73 | 15% | 29 | 12% | IBM DOORS |
| 501-1000 employees | 47 | 10% | 21 | 9% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 65 | 13% | 36 | 15% | Polarion |
| 5001-10000 employees | 30 | 6% | 22 | 9% | Polarion |
| 10,001+ employees | 81 | 17% | 46 | 20% | Polarion |
| Segment | IBM DOORS | share | Polarion | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 223 | 46% | 115 | 49% | Polarion |
| Technology & software | 88 | 18% | 30 | 13% | IBM DOORS |
| Business & finance services | 83 | 17% | 32 | 14% | IBM DOORS |
| Automotive | 38 | 8% | 30 | 13% | Polarion |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 13 | 3% | 9 | 4% | even |
| Property & construction | 12 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 9 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 6 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 6 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Health care | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Agriculture & forestry | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | IBM DOORS | share | Polarion | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 285 | 59% | 102 | 44% | IBM DOORS |
| Germany | 50 | 10% | 52 | 22% | Polarion |
| United Kingdom | 39 | 8% | 20 | 9% | even |
| France | 24 | 5% | 14 | 6% | even |
| Canada | 15 | 3% | 8 | 3% | even |
| Spain | 10 | 2% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Sweden | 8 | 2% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | 6 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Netherlands | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 5 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Italy | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | IBM DOORS | share | Polarion | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 2,907 | 65% | 505 | 42% | IBM DOORS |
| Software engineering | 516 | 12% | 197 | 16% | Polarion |
| IT operations & business systems | 186 | 4% | 87 | 7% | Polarion |
| Quality, safety & environment | 117 | 3% | 47 | 4% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 81 | 2% | 49 | 4% | Polarion |
| Data & AI | 26 | 1% | 11 | 1% | even |
| Administration & office | 23 | 1% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Sales | 10 | 0% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Construction and civil | 8 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | 6 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Arts media and entertainment | 5 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using IBM DOORS →
Companies using Polarion →
requirements mbse ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Polarion is named by 234 companies in job postings and IBM DOORS by 487; 235 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/ibm-doors-vs-polarion)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
IBM DOORS vs Polarion: questions
Which is more used, IBM DOORS or Polarion?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, IBM DOORS (487) over Polarion (234). By website-and-DNS footprint, Polarion (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses IBM DOORS?
38% of IBM DOORS companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 33% for Polarion. 36% of IBM DOORS companies have over 1,000 employees, against 44% for Polarion.
Do companies run both?
235 companies name both in their postings, usually IBM DOORS in marketing and Polarion in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on IBM DOORS or Polarion. Start free, no card.