IFS VS Infor M3
As of 30 October 2026, Infor M3 is named by 197 companies and IFS by 428; IFS skews to companies under 200 people (25% vs 25%), Infor M3 to companies over 1,000 (44% vs 41%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: IFS's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Infor M3 rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- IFS: 2–200 employees
- 25%
- Infor M3: 2–200 employees
- 25%
- IFS: 1,000+ employees
- 41%
- Infor M3: 1,000+ employees
- 44%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 4.1 · 2.9
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | IFS | share | Infor M3 | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 0% | 2 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 30 | 7% | 6 | 3% | IFS |
| 11-50 employees | 27 | 6% | 12 | 6% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 51 | 12% | 32 | 16% | Infor M3 |
| 201-500 employees | 75 | 18% | 31 | 16% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 66 | 15% | 28 | 14% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 96 | 22% | 50 | 25% | Infor M3 |
| 5001-10000 employees | 25 | 6% | 10 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 56 | 13% | 26 | 13% | even |
| Segment | IFS | share | Infor M3 | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 177 | 41% | 81 | 41% | even |
| Business & finance services | 46 | 11% | 22 | 11% | even |
| Technology & software | 35 | 8% | 20 | 10% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 34 | 8% | 19 | 10% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 29 | 7% | 2 | 1% | IFS |
| Property & construction | 26 | 6% | 13 | 7% | even |
| Automotive | 22 | 5% | 6 | 3% | IFS |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 16 | 4% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 12 | 3% | 9 | 5% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 11 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | 10 | 2% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Health care | 6 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 14 | 7% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | IFS | share | Infor M3 | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 205 | 48% | 108 | 55% | Infor M3 |
| United Kingdom | 38 | 9% | 7 | 4% | IFS |
| Germany | 37 | 9% | 14 | 7% | even |
| France | 27 | 6% | 16 | 8% | even |
| Poland | 20 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 17 | 4% | 14 | 7% | Infor M3 |
| Canada | 16 | 4% | 7 | 4% | even |
| Netherlands | 16 | 4% | 6 | 3% | even |
| Australia | 8 | 2% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Norway | 8 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | 6 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Belgium | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | IFS | share | Infor M3 | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 380 | 17% | 120 | 16% | even |
| Software engineering | 229 | 10% | 34 | 5% | IFS |
| Finance & accounting | 228 | 10% | 116 | 16% | Infor M3 |
| Product, program & project management | 162 | 7% | 27 | 4% | IFS |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 145 | 6% | 99 | 14% | Infor M3 |
| Data & AI | 122 | 5% | 21 | 3% | IFS |
| Engineering (non-software) | 108 | 5% | 20 | 3% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 95 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 79 | 3% | 25 | 3% | even |
| Procurement and purchasing | 77 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | 62 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | 57 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 29 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Public safety and protective services | – | – | 29 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 15 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality and food service | – | – | 14 | 2% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using IFS →
Companies using Infor M3 →
ERP suites ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Infor M3 is named by 197 companies in job postings and IFS by 428; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/ifs-vs-infor-m3)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
IFS vs Infor M3: questions
Which is more used, IFS or Infor M3?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, IFS (428) over Infor M3 (197). By website-and-DNS footprint, Infor M3 (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses IFS?
25% of IFS companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 25% for Infor M3. 41% of IFS companies have over 1,000 employees, against 44% for Infor M3.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually IFS in marketing and Infor M3 in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on IFS or Infor M3. Start free, no card.