IFS VS SAP ECC
As of 30 October 2026, SAP ECC is named by 902 companies and IFS by 428; IFS skews to companies under 200 people (25% vs 20%), SAP ECC to companies over 1,000 (63% vs 41%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: IFS's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, SAP ECC rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- IFS: 2–200 employees
- 25%
- SAP ECC: 2–200 employees
- 20%
- IFS: 1,000+ employees
- 41%
- SAP ECC: 1,000+ employees
- 63%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 4.1 · 4.1
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | IFS | share | SAP ECC | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 30 | 7% | 35 | 4% | IFS |
| 11-50 employees | 27 | 6% | 64 | 7% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 51 | 12% | 78 | 9% | IFS |
| 201-500 employees | 75 | 18% | 83 | 9% | IFS |
| 501-1000 employees | 66 | 15% | 75 | 8% | IFS |
| 1001-5000 employees | 96 | 22% | 211 | 23% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 25 | 6% | 76 | 8% | SAP ECC |
| 10,001+ employees | 56 | 13% | 277 | 31% | SAP ECC |
| Segment | IFS | share | SAP ECC | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 177 | 41% | 388 | 43% | even |
| Business & finance services | 46 | 11% | 81 | 9% | even |
| Technology & software | 35 | 8% | 149 | 17% | SAP ECC |
| Commerce & trade | 34 | 8% | 61 | 7% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 29 | 7% | 45 | 5% | even |
| Property & construction | 26 | 6% | 19 | 2% | IFS |
| Automotive | 22 | 5% | 41 | 5% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 16 | 4% | 27 | 3% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 12 | 3% | 15 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 11 | 3% | 18 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 10 | 2% | 21 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 6 | 1% | 25 | 3% | even |
| Segment | IFS | share | SAP ECC | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 205 | 48% | 360 | 40% | IFS |
| United Kingdom | 38 | 9% | 58 | 6% | IFS |
| Germany | 37 | 9% | 234 | 26% | SAP ECC |
| France | 27 | 6% | 29 | 3% | IFS |
| Poland | 20 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 17 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 16 | 4% | 17 | 2% | even |
| Netherlands | 16 | 4% | 17 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 8 | 2% | 10 | 1% | even |
| Norway | 8 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 34 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 18 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 10 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 10 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 9 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | IFS | share | SAP ECC | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 380 | 17% | 2,257 | 46% | SAP ECC |
| Software engineering | 229 | 10% | 252 | 5% | IFS |
| Finance & accounting | 228 | 10% | 430 | 9% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 162 | 7% | 140 | 3% | IFS |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 145 | 6% | 264 | 5% | even |
| Data & AI | 122 | 5% | 129 | 3% | IFS |
| Engineering (non-software) | 108 | 5% | 119 | 2% | IFS |
| Quality, safety & environment | 95 | 4% | 46 | 1% | IFS |
| Sales | 79 | 3% | 113 | 2% | even |
| Procurement and purchasing | 77 | 3% | 114 | 2% | even |
| Skilled trades and field service | 62 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | 57 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 57 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 47 | 1% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using IFS →
Companies using SAP ECC →
ERP suites ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
SAP ECC is named by 902 companies in job postings and IFS by 428; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/ifs-vs-sap-ecc)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
IFS vs SAP ECC: questions
Which is more used, IFS or SAP ECC?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, SAP ECC (902) over IFS (428). By website-and-DNS footprint, SAP ECC (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses IFS?
25% of IFS companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 20% for SAP ECC. 41% of IFS companies have over 1,000 employees, against 63% for SAP ECC.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually IFS in marketing and SAP ECC in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on IFS or SAP ECC. Start free, no card.