IFS VS SAP IS-U
As of 30 October 2026, SAP IS-U is named by 107 companies and IFS by 428; IFS skews to companies under 200 people (25% vs 34%), SAP IS-U to companies over 1,000 (37% vs 41%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: IFS's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, SAP IS-U rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- IFS: 2–200 employees
- 25%
- SAP IS-U: 2–200 employees
- 34%
- IFS: 1,000+ employees
- 41%
- SAP IS-U: 1,000+ employees
- 37%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 4.1 · 6.4
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | IFS | share | SAP IS-U | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 0% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 30 | 7% | 6 | 6% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 27 | 6% | 13 | 12% | SAP IS-U |
| 51-200 employees | 51 | 12% | 17 | 16% | SAP IS-U |
| 201-500 employees | 75 | 18% | 14 | 13% | IFS |
| 501-1000 employees | 66 | 15% | 16 | 15% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 96 | 22% | 26 | 24% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 25 | 6% | 6 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 56 | 13% | 8 | 7% | IFS |
| Segment | IFS | share | SAP IS-U | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 177 | 41% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business & finance services | 46 | 11% | 9 | 8% | IFS |
| Technology & software | 35 | 8% | 37 | 35% | SAP IS-U |
| Commerce & trade | 34 | 8% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 29 | 7% | 50 | 47% | SAP IS-U |
| Property & construction | 26 | 6% | 1 | 1% | IFS |
| Automotive | 22 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 16 | 4% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 12 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 11 | 3% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 10 | 2% | 4 | 4% | even |
| Health care | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | IFS | share | SAP IS-U | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 205 | 48% | 18 | 17% | IFS |
| United Kingdom | 38 | 9% | 2 | 2% | IFS |
| Germany | 37 | 9% | 65 | 61% | SAP IS-U |
| France | 27 | 6% | 4 | 4% | IFS |
| Poland | 20 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 17 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 16 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 16 | 4% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 8 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Norway | 8 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | 6 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Belgium | 5 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Switzerland | – | – | 3 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | IFS | share | SAP IS-U | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 380 | 17% | 466 | 47% | SAP IS-U |
| Software engineering | 229 | 10% | 189 | 19% | SAP IS-U |
| Finance & accounting | 228 | 10% | 21 | 2% | IFS |
| Product, program & project management | 162 | 7% | 37 | 4% | IFS |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 145 | 6% | 9 | 1% | IFS |
| Data & AI | 122 | 5% | 44 | 4% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 108 | 5% | 5 | 1% | IFS |
| Quality, safety & environment | 95 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 79 | 3% | 10 | 1% | IFS |
| Procurement and purchasing | 77 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | 62 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | 57 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 14 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 13 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 11 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using IFS →
Companies using SAP IS-U →
ERP suites ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
SAP IS-U is named by 107 companies in job postings and IFS by 428; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/ifs-vs-sap-is-u)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
IFS vs SAP IS-U: questions
Which is more used, IFS or SAP IS-U?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, IFS (428) over SAP IS-U (107). By website-and-DNS footprint, SAP IS-U (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses IFS?
25% of IFS companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 34% for SAP IS-U. 41% of IFS companies have over 1,000 employees, against 37% for SAP IS-U.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually IFS in marketing and SAP IS-U in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on IFS or SAP IS-U. Start free, no card.