Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · ERP suites

Infor M3 VS Lawson

As of 30 October 2026, Lawson is named by 132 companies and Infor M3 by 197; Infor M3 skews to companies under 200 people (25% vs 7%), Lawson to companies over 1,000 (80% vs 44%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Infor M3's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Lawson rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Infor M3: 2–200 employees
25%
Lawson: 2–200 employees
7%
Infor M3: 1,000+ employees
44%
Lawson: 1,000+ employees
80%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.9 · 5.3
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
197companies name Infor M3
132companies name Lawson
8name both
563 · 701postings in 90 days, Infor M3 · Lawson
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentInfor M3shareLawsonshareLeans
Self-employed21%––outside top 12
2-10 employees63%––outside top 12
11-50 employees126%32%Infor M3
51-200 employees3216%65%Infor M3
201-500 employees3116%108%Infor M3
501-1000 employees2814%75%Infor M3
1001-5000 employees5025%2519%Infor M3
5001-10000 employees105%2116%Lawson
10,001+ employees2613%6045%Lawson
By industry
SegmentInfor M3shareLawsonshareLeans
Manufacturing & industry8141%75%Infor M3
Business & finance services2211%65%Infor M3
Technology & software2010%118%even
Commerce & trade1910%108%Infor M3
Hospitality & travel147%32%Infor M3
Property & construction137%22%Infor M3
Consumer services & leisure95%32%Infor M3
Automotive63%11%Infor M3
Media & content53%––outside top 12
Transport, logistics & rental42%22%even
Health care21%7355%Lawson
Utilities & infrastructure21%54%Lawson
Public, community & associations––86%outside top 12
By country
SegmentInfor M3shareLawsonshareLeans
United States10855%12292%Lawson
France168%11%Infor M3
Germany147%––outside top 12
Sweden147%––outside top 12
Canada74%32%even
United Kingdom74%32%even
Netherlands63%––outside top 12
Australia53%11%even
Switzerland32%––outside top 12
Denmark32%––outside top 12
United Arab Emirates11%––outside top 12
Austria11%––outside top 12
Mexico––11%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentInfor M3shareLawsonshareLeans
IT operations & business systems12016%778%Infor M3
Finance & accounting11616%41945%Lawson
Logistics warehouse and transport9914%11712%even
Software engineering345%––outside top 12
General management & consulting294%––outside top 12
Public safety and protective services294%––outside top 12
Product, program & project management274%152%Infor M3
Sales253%––outside top 12
Data & AI213%81%Infor M3
Engineering (non-software)203%––outside top 12
Customer service & success152%81%even
Hospitality and food service142%––outside top 12
Human resources––475%outside top 12
Healthcare clinical––344%outside top 12
Administration & office––334%outside top 12
Healthcare support and caregiving––283%outside top 12
Procurement and purchasing––222%outside top 12
Skilled trades and field service––81%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Lawson is named by 132 companies in job postings and Infor M3 by 197; 8 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/infor-m3-vs-lawson)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Infor M3 vs Lawson: questions

Which is more used, Infor M3 or Lawson?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Infor M3 (197) over Lawson (132). By website-and-DNS footprint, Lawson (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Infor M3?

25% of Infor M3 companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 7% for Lawson. 44% of Infor M3 companies have over 1,000 employees, against 80% for Lawson.

Do companies run both?

8 companies name both in their postings, usually Infor M3 in marketing and Lawson in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Infor M3 or Lawson. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market