Infor M3 VS QAD
As of 30 October 2026, QAD is named by 135 companies and Infor M3 by 197; Infor M3 skews to companies under 200 people (25% vs 11%), QAD to companies over 1,000 (64% vs 44%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Infor M3's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, QAD rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Infor M3: 2–200 employees
- 25%
- QAD: 2–200 employees
- 11%
- Infor M3: 1,000+ employees
- 44%
- QAD: 1,000+ employees
- 64%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.9 · 3.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Infor M3 | share | QAD | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| 2-10 employees | 6 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 12 | 6% | 1 | 1% | Infor M3 |
| 51-200 employees | 32 | 16% | 12 | 9% | Infor M3 |
| 201-500 employees | 31 | 16% | 18 | 13% | Infor M3 |
| 501-1000 employees | 28 | 14% | 16 | 12% | Infor M3 |
| 1001-5000 employees | 50 | 25% | 32 | 24% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 10 | 5% | 15 | 11% | QAD |
| 10,001+ employees | 26 | 13% | 39 | 29% | QAD |
| Segment | Infor M3 | share | QAD | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 81 | 41% | 93 | 69% | QAD |
| Business & finance services | 22 | 11% | 8 | 6% | Infor M3 |
| Technology & software | 20 | 10% | 4 | 3% | Infor M3 |
| Commerce & trade | 19 | 10% | 3 | 2% | Infor M3 |
| Hospitality & travel | 14 | 7% | 1 | 1% | Infor M3 |
| Property & construction | 13 | 7% | 1 | 1% | Infor M3 |
| Consumer services & leisure | 9 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | 6 | 3% | 15 | 11% | QAD |
| Media & content | 5 | 3% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 4 | 2% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Health care | 2 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 2 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Infor M3 | share | QAD | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 108 | 55% | 99 | 73% | QAD |
| France | 16 | 8% | 4 | 3% | Infor M3 |
| Germany | 14 | 7% | 6 | 4% | Infor M3 |
| Sweden | 14 | 7% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 7 | 4% | 7 | 5% | even |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 4% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Netherlands | 6 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 5 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Denmark | 3 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 1 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Japan | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Infor M3 | share | QAD | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 120 | 16% | 44 | 8% | Infor M3 |
| Finance & accounting | 116 | 16% | 86 | 15% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 99 | 14% | 122 | 22% | QAD |
| Software engineering | 34 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 29 | 4% | 14 | 3% | even |
| Public safety and protective services | 29 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 27 | 4% | 13 | 2% | even |
| Sales | 25 | 3% | 12 | 2% | even |
| Data & AI | 21 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 20 | 3% | 33 | 6% | QAD |
| Customer service & success | 15 | 2% | 27 | 5% | QAD |
| Hospitality and food service | 14 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Procurement and purchasing | – | – | 42 | 8% | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | – | – | 30 | 5% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 17 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 9 | 2% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Infor M3 →
Companies using QAD →
ERP suites ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
QAD is named by 135 companies in job postings and Infor M3 by 197; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/infor-m3-vs-qad)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Infor M3 vs QAD: questions
Which is more used, Infor M3 or QAD?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Infor M3 (197) over QAD (135). By website-and-DNS footprint, QAD (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Infor M3?
25% of Infor M3 companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 11% for QAD. 44% of Infor M3 companies have over 1,000 employees, against 64% for QAD.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Infor M3 in marketing and QAD in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Infor M3 or QAD. Start free, no card.