Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · network protocols

IPsec VS Spanning Tree Protocol

As of 30 October 2026, Spanning Tree Protocol is named by 234 companies and IPsec by 547; IPsec skews to companies under 200 people (37% vs 35%), Spanning Tree Protocol to companies over 1,000 (44% vs 38%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: IPsec's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Spanning Tree Protocol rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

IPsec: 2–200 employees
37%
Spanning Tree Protocol: 2–200 employees
35%
IPsec: 1,000+ employees
38%
Spanning Tree Protocol: 1,000+ employees
44%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.6 · 3.2
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
547companies name IPsec
234companies name Spanning Tree Protocol
90name both
1,418 · 747postings in 90 days, IPsec · Spanning Tree Protocol
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentIPsecshareSpanning Tree ProtocolshareLeans
Self-employed41%31%even
2-10 employees305%125%even
11-50 employees5911%2511%even
51-200 employees11321%4519%even
201-500 employees7914%3113%even
501-1000 employees5410%167%IPsec
1001-5000 employees9317%4118%even
5001-10000 employees377%2310%Spanning Tree Protocol
10,001+ employees7814%3816%even
By industry
SegmentIPsecshareSpanning Tree ProtocolshareLeans
Technology & software26849%10344%IPsec
Business & finance services9417%3515%IPsec
Manufacturing & industry7213%3013%even
Utilities & infrastructure428%156%even
Media & content163%104%even
Public, community & associations102%42%even
Property & construction102%73%even
Transport, logistics & rental81%52%even
Consumer services & leisure71%94%Spanning Tree Protocol
Automotive61%52%even
Commerce & trade51%42%even
Health care51%52%even
By country
SegmentIPsecshareSpanning Tree ProtocolshareLeans
United States34663%14763%even
Germany397%156%even
United Kingdom275%83%even
France183%136%Spanning Tree Protocol
Canada173%63%even
India143%94%even
Italy122%73%even
Brazil71%52%even
Netherlands71%21%even
Poland61%––outside top 12
Australia51%––outside top 12
Romania51%––outside top 12
Switzerland––31%outside top 12
Japan––31%outside top 12
Sweden––21%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentIPsecshareSpanning Tree ProtocolshareLeans
IT operations & business systems1,19358%60959%even
Software engineering25212%959%IPsec
Engineering (non-software)1266%222%IPsec
Customer service & success945%323%even
Sales874%374%even
Product, program & project management211%61%even
Quality, safety & environment60%20%even
Skilled trades and field service60%––outside top 12
Marketing & communications40%––outside top 12
Construction and civil30%––outside top 12
General management & consulting30%61%even
Facilities cleaning and security20%––outside top 12
Design & UX––20%outside top 12
Human resources––20%outside top 12
Finance & accounting––10%outside top 12
Legal, compliance & risk––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Spanning Tree Protocol is named by 234 companies in job postings and IPsec by 547; 90 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/ipsec-vs-spanning-tree-protocol)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

IPsec vs Spanning Tree Protocol: questions

Which is more used, IPsec or Spanning Tree Protocol?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, IPsec (547) over Spanning Tree Protocol (234). By website-and-DNS footprint, Spanning Tree Protocol (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses IPsec?

37% of IPsec companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 35% for Spanning Tree Protocol. 38% of IPsec companies have over 1,000 employees, against 44% for Spanning Tree Protocol.

Do companies run both?

90 companies name both in their postings, usually IPsec in marketing and Spanning Tree Protocol in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on IPsec or Spanning Tree Protocol. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market