iSCSI VS Microsoft DFS
As of 30 October 2026, Microsoft DFS is named by 136 companies and iSCSI by 188; iSCSI skews to companies under 200 people (39% vs 38%), Microsoft DFS to companies over 1,000 (36% vs 36%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: iSCSI's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Microsoft DFS rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- iSCSI: 2–200 employees
- 39%
- Microsoft DFS: 2–200 employees
- 38%
- iSCSI: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- Microsoft DFS: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.6 · 2.4
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | iSCSI | share | Microsoft DFS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 7 | 4% | 5 | 4% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 27 | 14% | 25 | 18% | Microsoft DFS |
| 51-200 employees | 39 | 21% | 22 | 16% | iSCSI |
| 201-500 employees | 33 | 18% | 19 | 14% | iSCSI |
| 501-1000 employees | 15 | 8% | 15 | 11% | Microsoft DFS |
| 1001-5000 employees | 40 | 21% | 22 | 16% | iSCSI |
| 5001-10000 employees | 6 | 3% | 12 | 9% | Microsoft DFS |
| 10,001+ employees | 21 | 11% | 15 | 11% | even |
| Self-employed | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | iSCSI | share | Microsoft DFS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 103 | 55% | 55 | 40% | iSCSI |
| Manufacturing & industry | 29 | 15% | 21 | 15% | even |
| Business & finance services | 24 | 13% | 27 | 20% | Microsoft DFS |
| Commerce & trade | 6 | 3% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 6 | 3% | 7 | 5% | even |
| Health care | 5 | 3% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 5 | 3% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 3 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 2 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 2 | 1% | 6 | 4% | Microsoft DFS |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Segment | iSCSI | share | Microsoft DFS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 124 | 66% | 87 | 64% | even |
| Germany | 10 | 5% | 10 | 7% | Microsoft DFS |
| Canada | 6 | 3% | 5 | 4% | even |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 3% | 4 | 3% | even |
| India | 5 | 3% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Italy | 5 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Australia | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| France | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Switzerland | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Estonia | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | iSCSI | share | Microsoft DFS | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 345 | 50% | 293 | 59% | Microsoft DFS |
| Software engineering | 106 | 15% | 52 | 10% | iSCSI |
| Sales | 45 | 7% | 8 | 2% | iSCSI |
| Engineering (non-software) | 33 | 5% | 40 | 8% | Microsoft DFS |
| Customer service & success | 13 | 2% | 13 | 3% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 8 | 1% | 18 | 4% | Microsoft DFS |
| Quality, safety & environment | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 3 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Arts media and entertainment | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Skilled trades and field service | 1 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using iSCSI →
Companies using Microsoft DFS →
storage systems ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Microsoft DFS is named by 136 companies in job postings and iSCSI by 188; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/iscsi-vs-microsoft-dfs)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
iSCSI vs Microsoft DFS: questions
Which is more used, iSCSI or Microsoft DFS?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, iSCSI (188) over Microsoft DFS (136). By website-and-DNS footprint, Microsoft DFS (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses iSCSI?
39% of iSCSI companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 38% for Microsoft DFS. 36% of iSCSI companies have over 1,000 employees, against 36% for Microsoft DFS.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually iSCSI in marketing and Microsoft DFS in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on iSCSI or Microsoft DFS. Start free, no card.