Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · api specs data formats

ISO 20022 VS JSON Schema

As of 30 October 2026, JSON Schema is named by 127 companies and ISO 20022 by 202; ISO 20022 skews to companies under 200 people (22% vs 34%), JSON Schema to companies over 1,000 (35% vs 57%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: ISO 20022's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, JSON Schema rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

ISO 20022: 2–200 employees
22%
JSON Schema: 2–200 employees
34%
ISO 20022: 1,000+ employees
57%
JSON Schema: 1,000+ employees
35%
Postings per company, 90 days
3.3 · 1.9
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
202companies name ISO 20022
127companies name JSON Schema
0name both
668 · 245postings in 90 days, ISO 20022 · JSON Schema
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentISO 20022shareJSON SchemashareLeans
Self-employed21%54%JSON Schema
2-10 employees115%65%even
11-50 employees136%1915%JSON Schema
51-200 employees2110%1814%JSON Schema
201-500 employees2512%2016%JSON Schema
501-1000 employees157%1512%JSON Schema
1001-5000 employees4824%1512%ISO 20022
5001-10000 employees199%86%ISO 20022
10,001+ employees4824%2117%ISO 20022
By industry
SegmentISO 20022shareJSON SchemashareLeans
Business & finance services11557%2318%ISO 20022
Technology & software5929%6854%JSON Schema
Manufacturing & industry115%129%JSON Schema
Utilities & infrastructure52%32%even
Media & content31%54%JSON Schema
Transport, logistics & rental31%22%even
Public, community & associations21%54%JSON Schema
Consumer services & leisure21%22%even
Automotive10%22%even
Commerce & trade10%11%even
Health care––32%outside top 12
Hospitality & travel––11%outside top 12
By country
SegmentISO 20022shareJSON SchemashareLeans
United States9246%9071%JSON Schema
United Kingdom2311%129%even
Germany199%11%ISO 20022
France126%11%ISO 20022
Canada84%43%even
Australia52%43%even
India52%22%even
Switzerland31%––outside top 12
Denmark31%11%even
Lithuania31%––outside top 12
Portugal31%––outside top 12
Singapore31%22%even
Brazil––32%outside top 12
Mexico––22%outside top 12
Austria––11%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentISO 20022shareJSON SchemashareLeans
Software engineering21426%12942%JSON Schema
IT operations & business systems18923%206%ISO 20022
Product, program & project management9411%31%ISO 20022
Finance & accounting567%––outside top 12
Data & AI172%8828%JSON Schema
General management & consulting111%––outside top 12
Sales111%21%even
Legal, compliance & risk61%41%even
Business development & strategy51%––outside top 12
Customer service & success51%––outside top 12
Manufacturing and production40%––outside top 12
Marketing & communications40%10%even
Engineering (non-software)––31%outside top 12
Design & UX––21%outside top 12
Administration & office––10%outside top 12
Arts media and entertainment––10%outside top 12
Real estate and property––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

JSON Schema is named by 127 companies in job postings and ISO 20022 by 202; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/iso-20022-vs-json-schema)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

ISO 20022 vs JSON Schema: questions

Which is more used, ISO 20022 or JSON Schema?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, ISO 20022 (202) over JSON Schema (127). By website-and-DNS footprint, JSON Schema (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses ISO 20022?

22% of ISO 20022 companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 34% for JSON Schema. 57% of ISO 20022 companies have over 1,000 employees, against 35% for JSON Schema.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually ISO 20022 in marketing and JSON Schema in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on ISO 20022 or JSON Schema. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market