Jaeger VS New Relic
As of 30 October 2026, New Relic is named by 710 companies and Jaeger by 137; Jaeger skews to companies under 200 people (31% vs 38%), New Relic to companies over 1,000 (34% vs 39%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Jaeger's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, New Relic rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Jaeger: 2–200 employees
- 31%
- New Relic: 2–200 employees
- 38%
- Jaeger: 1,000+ employees
- 39%
- New Relic: 1,000+ employees
- 34%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.3 · 2.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 586
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Jaeger | share | New Relic | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 2% | 3 | 0% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 10 | 7% | 37 | 5% | Jaeger |
| 11-50 employees | 13 | 9% | 101 | 14% | New Relic |
| 51-200 employees | 20 | 15% | 129 | 18% | New Relic |
| 201-500 employees | 27 | 20% | 107 | 15% | Jaeger |
| 501-1000 employees | 11 | 8% | 90 | 13% | New Relic |
| 1001-5000 employees | 26 | 19% | 128 | 18% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 13 | 9% | 35 | 5% | Jaeger |
| 10,001+ employees | 14 | 10% | 80 | 11% | even |
| Segment | Jaeger | share | New Relic | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 73 | 53% | 417 | 59% | New Relic |
| Business & finance services | 32 | 23% | 128 | 18% | Jaeger |
| Manufacturing & industry | 12 | 9% | 33 | 5% | Jaeger |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 9 | 7% | 9 | 1% | Jaeger |
| Health care | 2 | 1% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 2 | 1% | 32 | 5% | New Relic |
| Property & construction | 2 | 1% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 2 | 1% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 1 | 1% | 33 | 5% | New Relic |
| Consumer services & leisure | 1 | 1% | 12 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 1% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | – | – | 10 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Jaeger | share | New Relic | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 87 | 64% | 484 | 68% | New Relic |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 9% | 65 | 9% | even |
| Germany | 7 | 5% | 15 | 2% | Jaeger |
| France | 5 | 4% | 9 | 1% | Jaeger |
| Australia | 2 | 1% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Canada | 2 | 1% | 14 | 2% | even |
| India | 2 | 1% | 13 | 2% | even |
| Poland | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Romania | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 2 | 1% | 8 | 1% | even |
| TH | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 13 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Japan | – | – | 11 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Croatia | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Jaeger | share | New Relic | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 264 | 58% | 1,565 | 64% | New Relic |
| IT operations & business systems | 33 | 7% | 304 | 12% | New Relic |
| Quality, safety & environment | 29 | 6% | 15 | 1% | Jaeger |
| Facilities cleaning and security | 26 | 6% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 12 | 3% | 52 | 2% | even |
| Skilled trades and field service | 10 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 7 | 2% | 87 | 4% | New Relic |
| Product, program & project management | 7 | 2% | 41 | 2% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 3 | 1% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 1 | 0% | 62 | 3% | New Relic |
| Sales | – | – | 46 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Jaeger →
Companies using New Relic →
apm tracing errors ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
New Relic is named by 710 companies in job postings and Jaeger by 137; 24 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/jaeger-vs-new-relic)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Jaeger vs New Relic: questions
Which is more used, Jaeger or New Relic?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, New Relic (710) over Jaeger (137). By website-and-DNS footprint, New Relic (586 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Jaeger?
31% of Jaeger companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 38% for New Relic. 39% of Jaeger companies have over 1,000 employees, against 34% for New Relic.
Do companies run both?
24 companies name both in their postings, usually Jaeger in marketing and New Relic in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Jaeger or New Relic. Start free, no card.