Jama Connect VS MagicDraw
As of 30 October 2026, MagicDraw is named by 120 companies and Jama Connect by 301; Jama Connect skews to companies under 200 people (37% vs 43%), MagicDraw to companies over 1,000 (33% vs 35%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Jama Connect's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, MagicDraw rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Jama Connect: 2–200 employees
- 37%
- MagicDraw: 2–200 employees
- 43%
- Jama Connect: 1,000+ employees
- 35%
- MagicDraw: 1,000+ employees
- 33%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 4.0 · 5.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Jama Connect | share | MagicDraw | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 4 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 17 | 6% | 6 | 5% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 33 | 11% | 17 | 14% | MagicDraw |
| 51-200 employees | 61 | 20% | 28 | 23% | MagicDraw |
| 201-500 employees | 52 | 17% | 22 | 18% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 29 | 10% | 6 | 5% | Jama Connect |
| 1001-5000 employees | 47 | 16% | 18 | 15% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 18 | 6% | 4 | 3% | Jama Connect |
| 10,001+ employees | 40 | 13% | 18 | 15% | even |
| Segment | Jama Connect | share | MagicDraw | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 167 | 55% | 51 | 43% | Jama Connect |
| Technology & software | 46 | 15% | 32 | 27% | MagicDraw |
| Business & finance services | 35 | 12% | 20 | 17% | MagicDraw |
| Automotive | 16 | 5% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 10 | 3% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 7 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 5 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | 4 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 3 | 1% | 4 | 3% | MagicDraw |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Jama Connect | share | MagicDraw | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 211 | 70% | 103 | 86% | MagicDraw |
| United Kingdom | 24 | 8% | 5 | 4% | Jama Connect |
| Germany | 15 | 5% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Canada | 7 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Spain | 7 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| France | 6 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Sweden | 5 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Jama Connect | share | MagicDraw | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 848 | 56% | 641 | 77% | MagicDraw |
| Software engineering | 245 | 16% | 57 | 7% | Jama Connect |
| Quality, safety & environment | 96 | 6% | 6 | 1% | Jama Connect |
| Product, program & project management | 70 | 5% | 1 | 0% | Jama Connect |
| IT operations & business systems | 65 | 4% | 38 | 5% | even |
| Administration & office | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 5 | 0% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Design & UX | 4 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Research and science | 3 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Arts media and entertainment | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Jama Connect →
Companies using MagicDraw →
requirements mbse ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
MagicDraw is named by 120 companies in job postings and Jama Connect by 301; 44 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/jama-connect-vs-magicdraw)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Jama Connect vs MagicDraw: questions
Which is more used, Jama Connect or MagicDraw?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Jama Connect (301) over MagicDraw (120). By website-and-DNS footprint, MagicDraw (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Jama Connect?
37% of Jama Connect companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 43% for MagicDraw. 35% of Jama Connect companies have over 1,000 employees, against 33% for MagicDraw.
Do companies run both?
44 companies name both in their postings, usually Jama Connect in marketing and MagicDraw in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Jama Connect or MagicDraw. Start free, no card.