Jetpack Compose VS SwiftUI
As of 4 November 2026, SwiftUI is named by 697 companies and Jetpack Compose by 560; Jetpack Compose skews to companies under 200 people (46% vs 50%), SwiftUI to companies over 1,000 (23% vs 29%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Jetpack Compose's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, SwiftUI rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Jetpack Compose: 2–200 employees
- 46%
- SwiftUI: 2–200 employees
- 50%
- Jetpack Compose: 1,000+ employees
- 29%
- SwiftUI: 1,000+ employees
- 23%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.7 · 2.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Jetpack Compose | share | SwiftUI | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 20 | 4% | 46 | 7% | SwiftUI |
| 2-10 employees | 48 | 9% | 82 | 12% | SwiftUI |
| 11-50 employees | 89 | 16% | 125 | 18% | SwiftUI |
| 51-200 employees | 122 | 22% | 141 | 20% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 70 | 13% | 79 | 11% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 47 | 8% | 61 | 9% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 65 | 12% | 81 | 12% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 25 | 4% | 28 | 4% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 74 | 13% | 54 | 8% | Jetpack Compose |
| Segment | Jetpack Compose | share | SwiftUI | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 277 | 49% | 380 | 55% | SwiftUI |
| Business & finance services | 96 | 17% | 124 | 18% | even |
| Media & content | 54 | 10% | 51 | 7% | Jetpack Compose |
| Manufacturing & industry | 35 | 6% | 36 | 5% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 18 | 3% | 19 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 16 | 3% | 24 | 3% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 13 | 2% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 13 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | 10 | 2% | 16 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 9 | 2% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 9 | 2% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 5 | 1% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | – | – | 8 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Jetpack Compose | share | SwiftUI | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 274 | 49% | 389 | 56% | SwiftUI |
| United Kingdom | 47 | 8% | 55 | 8% | even |
| India | 34 | 6% | 30 | 4% | even |
| Germany | 20 | 4% | 16 | 2% | even |
| France | 16 | 3% | 17 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 15 | 3% | 19 | 3% | even |
| Poland | 15 | 3% | 12 | 2% | even |
| Sweden | 11 | 2% | 14 | 2% | even |
| Brazil | 10 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 9 | 2% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Japan | 8 | 1% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Italy | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 8 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 7 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Jetpack Compose | share | SwiftUI | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 1,846 | 92% | 1,869 | 87% | Jetpack Compose |
| IT operations & business systems | 30 | 1% | 51 | 2% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 11 | 1% | 16 | 1% | even |
| Data & AI | 9 | 0% | 21 | 1% | even |
| Design & UX | 9 | 0% | 25 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 6 | 0% | 12 | 1% | even |
| Unclassified | 6 | 0% | 15 | 1% | even |
| Customer service & success | 4 | 0% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Human resources | 2 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Arts media and entertainment | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Sales | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Jetpack Compose →
Companies using SwiftUI →
mobile desktop frameworks ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
SwiftUI is named by 697 companies in job postings and Jetpack Compose by 560; 197 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/jetpack-compose-vs-swiftui)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Jetpack Compose vs SwiftUI: questions
Which is more used, Jetpack Compose or SwiftUI?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, SwiftUI (697) over Jetpack Compose (560). By website-and-DNS footprint, SwiftUI (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Jetpack Compose?
46% of Jetpack Compose companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 50% for SwiftUI. 29% of Jetpack Compose companies have over 1,000 employees, against 23% for SwiftUI.
Do companies run both?
197 companies name both in their postings, usually Jetpack Compose in marketing and SwiftUI in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Jetpack Compose or SwiftUI. Start free, no card.