JSON VS SAP IDoc
As of 30 October 2026, SAP IDoc is named by 523 companies and JSON by 4,803; JSON skews to companies under 200 people (48% vs 26%), SAP IDoc to companies over 1,000 (56% vs 28%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: JSON's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, SAP IDoc rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- JSON: 2–200 employees
- 48%
- SAP IDoc: 2–200 employees
- 26%
- JSON: 1,000+ employees
- 28%
- SAP IDoc: 1,000+ employees
- 56%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.5 · 4.2
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | JSON | share | SAP IDoc | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 44 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 301 | 6% | 23 | 4% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 932 | 19% | 52 | 10% | JSON |
| 51-200 employees | 1,092 | 23% | 61 | 12% | JSON |
| 201-500 employees | 634 | 13% | 51 | 10% | JSON |
| 501-1000 employees | 463 | 10% | 40 | 8% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 731 | 15% | 95 | 18% | SAP IDoc |
| 5001-10000 employees | 201 | 4% | 43 | 8% | SAP IDoc |
| 10,001+ employees | 405 | 8% | 153 | 29% | SAP IDoc |
| Segment | JSON | share | SAP IDoc | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 2,410 | 50% | 178 | 34% | JSON |
| Business & finance services | 989 | 21% | 47 | 9% | JSON |
| Manufacturing & industry | 442 | 9% | 156 | 30% | SAP IDoc |
| Commerce & trade | 136 | 3% | 38 | 7% | SAP IDoc |
| Media & content | 119 | 2% | 16 | 3% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 115 | 2% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 115 | 2% | 20 | 4% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 111 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 90 | 2% | 12 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 88 | 2% | 12 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 86 | 2% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 52 | 1% | 21 | 4% | SAP IDoc |
| Segment | JSON | share | SAP IDoc | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 2,748 | 57% | 245 | 47% | JSON |
| United Kingdom | 324 | 7% | 31 | 6% | even |
| India | 276 | 6% | 19 | 4% | JSON |
| Germany | 271 | 6% | 101 | 19% | SAP IDoc |
| Canada | 141 | 3% | 15 | 3% | even |
| France | 134 | 3% | 14 | 3% | even |
| Australia | 83 | 2% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 69 | 1% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Spain | 57 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 56 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 55 | 1% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Switzerland | 51 | 1% | 12 | 2% | even |
| Belgium | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | JSON | share | SAP IDoc | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 10,471 | 43% | 385 | 14% | JSON |
| IT operations & business systems | 2,376 | 10% | 1,842 | 66% | SAP IDoc |
| Data & AI | 1,783 | 7% | 31 | 1% | JSON |
| Sales | 616 | 3% | 5 | 0% | JSON |
| Engineering (non-software) | 567 | 2% | 6 | 0% | JSON |
| Product, program & project management | 515 | 2% | 24 | 1% | even |
| Customer service & success | 326 | 1% | 12 | 0% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 225 | 1% | 27 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 211 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 177 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 174 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | 136 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 49 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 23 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | – | – | 9 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 6 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using JSON →
Companies using SAP IDoc →
api specs data formats ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
SAP IDoc is named by 523 companies in job postings and JSON by 4,803; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/json-vs-sap-idoc)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
JSON vs SAP IDoc: questions
Which is more used, JSON or SAP IDoc?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, JSON (4,803) over SAP IDoc (523). By website-and-DNS footprint, SAP IDoc (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses JSON?
48% of JSON companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 26% for SAP IDoc. 28% of JSON companies have over 1,000 employees, against 56% for SAP IDoc.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually JSON in marketing and SAP IDoc in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on JSON or SAP IDoc. Start free, no card.