Karate VS UFT (Unified Functional Testing)
As of 30 October 2026, UFT (Unified Functional Testing) is named by 185 companies and Karate by 124; Karate skews to companies under 200 people (34% vs 50%), UFT (Unified Functional Testing) to companies over 1,000 (29% vs 37%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Karate's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, UFT (Unified Functional Testing) rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Karate: 2–200 employees
- 34%
- UFT (Unified Functional Testing): 2–200 employees
- 50%
- Karate: 1,000+ employees
- 37%
- UFT (Unified Functional Testing): 1,000+ employees
- 29%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.7 · 3.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Karate | share | UFT (Unified Functional Testing) | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 12 | 10% | 8 | 4% | Karate |
| 11-50 employees | 12 | 10% | 38 | 21% | UFT (Unified Functional Testing) |
| 51-200 employees | 18 | 15% | 47 | 25% | UFT (Unified Functional Testing) |
| 201-500 employees | 21 | 17% | 24 | 13% | Karate |
| 501-1000 employees | 15 | 12% | 13 | 7% | Karate |
| 1001-5000 employees | 16 | 13% | 29 | 16% | UFT (Unified Functional Testing) |
| 5001-10000 employees | 6 | 5% | 11 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 24 | 19% | 14 | 8% | Karate |
| Self-employed | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Karate | share | UFT (Unified Functional Testing) | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 64 | 52% | 130 | 70% | UFT (Unified Functional Testing) |
| Business & finance services | 26 | 21% | 28 | 15% | Karate |
| Consumer services & leisure | 7 | 6% | 4 | 2% | Karate |
| Media & content | 5 | 4% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 5 | 4% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 4 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Health care | 3 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 3 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 2 | 2% | 9 | 5% | UFT (Unified Functional Testing) |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 2 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Segment | Karate | share | UFT (Unified Functional Testing) | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 73 | 59% | 121 | 65% | UFT (Unified Functional Testing) |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 7% | 13 | 7% | even |
| India | 6 | 5% | 7 | 4% | even |
| Switzerland | 5 | 4% | 2 | 1% | Karate |
| Spain | 5 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 3 | 2% | 8 | 4% | even |
| France | 3 | 2% | 9 | 5% | UFT (Unified Functional Testing) |
| Singapore | 3 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| United Arab Emirates | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Canada | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| PK | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Bulgaria | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Karate | share | UFT (Unified Functional Testing) | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 342 | 77% | 1,110 | 81% | UFT (Unified Functional Testing) |
| Quality, safety & environment | 18 | 4% | 42 | 3% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 12 | 3% | 46 | 3% | even |
| Data & AI | 9 | 2% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Personal care and wellness | 9 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 3 | 1% | 55 | 4% | UFT (Unified Functional Testing) |
| Unclassified | 3 | 1% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 2 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Retail & store operations | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Social care and community | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Procurement and purchasing | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Karate →
Companies using UFT (Unified Functional Testing) →
test automation ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
UFT (Unified Functional Testing) is named by 185 companies in job postings and Karate by 124; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/karate-vs-uft)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Karate vs UFT (Unified Functional Testing): questions
Which is more used, Karate or UFT (Unified Functional Testing)?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, UFT (Unified Functional Testing) (185) over Karate (124). By website-and-DNS footprint, UFT (Unified Functional Testing) (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Karate?
34% of Karate companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 50% for UFT (Unified Functional Testing). 37% of Karate companies have over 1,000 employees, against 29% for UFT (Unified Functional Testing).
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Karate in marketing and UFT (Unified Functional Testing) in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Karate or UFT (Unified Functional Testing). Start free, no card.