Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · unit testing frameworks

Karma VS React Testing Library

As of 30 October 2026, React Testing Library is named by 335 companies and Karma by 248; Karma skews to companies under 200 people (46% vs 57%), React Testing Library to companies over 1,000 (20% vs 30%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Karma's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, React Testing Library rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Karma: 2–200 employees
46%
React Testing Library: 2–200 employees
57%
Karma: 1,000+ employees
30%
React Testing Library: 1,000+ employees
20%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.6 · 2.1
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
248companies name Karma
335companies name React Testing Library
0name both
636 · 716postings in 90 days, Karma · React Testing Library
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentKarmashareReact Testing LibraryshareLeans
Self-employed42%51%even
2-10 employees125%4112%React Testing Library
11-50 employees5221%7522%even
51-200 employees5020%7522%React Testing Library
201-500 employees3715%4814%even
501-1000 employees198%237%even
1001-5000 employees4317%4112%Karma
5001-10000 employees94%72%even
10,001+ employees229%206%Karma
By industry
SegmentKarmashareReact Testing LibraryshareLeans
Technology & software14458%20461%React Testing Library
Business & finance services5020%6519%even
Manufacturing & industry229%185%Karma
Media & content104%103%even
Consumer services & leisure52%72%even
Commerce & trade42%154%React Testing Library
Public, community & associations21%21%even
Health care21%41%even
Hospitality & travel21%10%even
Property & construction21%––outside top 12
Transport, logistics & rental21%41%even
Utilities & infrastructure21%31%even
Automotive––21%outside top 12
By country
SegmentKarmashareReact Testing LibraryshareLeans
United States13454%19257%React Testing Library
United Kingdom198%3510%React Testing Library
Germany156%103%Karma
India156%227%even
France125%82%Karma
Spain73%––outside top 12
Brazil42%31%even
Canada42%93%even
Italy42%––outside top 12
Romania42%––outside top 12
Australia31%51%even
Mexico31%––outside top 12
Poland––51%outside top 12
Singapore––51%outside top 12
Lithuania––41%outside top 12
United Arab Emirates––31%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentKarmashareReact Testing LibraryshareLeans
Software engineering83782%89194%React Testing Library
Sales434%10%Karma
General management & consulting232%––outside top 12
Design & UX151%10%even
IT operations & business systems91%81%even
Marketing & communications91%––outside top 12
Retail & store operations81%––outside top 12
Customer service & success61%20%even
Data & AI50%40%even
Arts media and entertainment20%––outside top 12
Business development & strategy20%––outside top 12
Engineering (non-software)20%91%even
Quality, safety & environment––10%outside top 12
Unclassified––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

React Testing Library is named by 335 companies in job postings and Karma by 248; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/karma-test-runner-vs-react-testing-library)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Karma vs React Testing Library: questions

Which is more used, Karma or React Testing Library?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, React Testing Library (335) over Karma (248). By website-and-DNS footprint, React Testing Library (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Karma?

46% of Karma companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 57% for React Testing Library. 30% of Karma companies have over 1,000 employees, against 20% for React Testing Library.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Karma in marketing and React Testing Library in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Karma or React Testing Library. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market