KVM VS Microsoft Hyper-V
As of 30 October 2026, Microsoft Hyper-V is named by 1,646 companies and KVM by 544; KVM skews to companies under 200 people (50% vs 45%), Microsoft Hyper-V to companies over 1,000 (30% vs 29%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: KVM's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Microsoft Hyper-V rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- KVM: 2–200 employees
- 50%
- Microsoft Hyper-V: 2–200 employees
- 45%
- KVM: 1,000+ employees
- 29%
- Microsoft Hyper-V: 1,000+ employees
- 30%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.9 · 2.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | KVM | share | Microsoft Hyper-V | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 4 | 1% | 15 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 38 | 7% | 94 | 6% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 108 | 20% | 274 | 17% | KVM |
| 51-200 employees | 124 | 23% | 366 | 22% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 78 | 14% | 262 | 16% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 34 | 6% | 146 | 9% | Microsoft Hyper-V |
| 1001-5000 employees | 85 | 16% | 251 | 15% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 12 | 2% | 63 | 4% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 61 | 11% | 175 | 11% | even |
| Segment | KVM | share | Microsoft Hyper-V | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 327 | 60% | 713 | 43% | KVM |
| Manufacturing & industry | 67 | 12% | 275 | 17% | Microsoft Hyper-V |
| Business & finance services | 51 | 9% | 196 | 12% | Microsoft Hyper-V |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 29 | 5% | 68 | 4% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 20 | 4% | 48 | 3% | even |
| Media & content | 18 | 3% | 38 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 13 | 2% | 53 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 8 | 1% | 70 | 4% | Microsoft Hyper-V |
| Automotive | 4 | 1% | 38 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | 3 | 1% | 41 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 1% | 38 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 1 | 0% | 54 | 3% | Microsoft Hyper-V |
| Segment | KVM | share | Microsoft Hyper-V | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 300 | 55% | 802 | 49% | KVM |
| Germany | 51 | 9% | 236 | 14% | Microsoft Hyper-V |
| United Kingdom | 27 | 5% | 112 | 7% | even |
| Netherlands | 15 | 3% | 29 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 13 | 2% | 52 | 3% | even |
| France | 12 | 2% | 72 | 4% | Microsoft Hyper-V |
| India | 11 | 2% | 32 | 2% | even |
| Sweden | 11 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 10 | 2% | 24 | 1% | even |
| Singapore | 10 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 7 | 1% | 19 | 1% | even |
| Finland | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 29 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 24 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 19 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | KVM | share | Microsoft Hyper-V | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 849 | 39% | 3,535 | 64% | Microsoft Hyper-V |
| Software engineering | 718 | 33% | 398 | 7% | KVM |
| Engineering (non-software) | 119 | 6% | 384 | 7% | even |
| Sales | 82 | 4% | 124 | 2% | even |
| Customer service & success | 53 | 2% | 150 | 3% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 25 | 1% | 64 | 1% | even |
| Data & AI | 18 | 1% | 18 | 0% | even |
| Arts media and entertainment | 9 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 4 | 0% | 8 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | 3 | 0% | 13 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 58 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | – | – | 28 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 7 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using KVM →
Companies using Microsoft Hyper-V →
virtualization vdi ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Microsoft Hyper-V is named by 1,646 companies in job postings and KVM by 544; 243 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/kvm-vs-microsoft-hyper-v)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
KVM vs Microsoft Hyper-V: questions
Which is more used, KVM or Microsoft Hyper-V?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Microsoft Hyper-V (1,646) over KVM (544). By website-and-DNS footprint, Microsoft Hyper-V (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses KVM?
50% of KVM companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 45% for Microsoft Hyper-V. 29% of KVM companies have over 1,000 employees, against 30% for Microsoft Hyper-V.
Do companies run both?
243 companies name both in their postings, usually KVM in marketing and Microsoft Hyper-V in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on KVM or Microsoft Hyper-V. Start free, no card.