KVM VS Proxmox VE
As of 30 October 2026, Proxmox VE is named by 560 companies and KVM by 544; KVM skews to companies under 200 people (50% vs 56%), Proxmox VE to companies over 1,000 (20% vs 29%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: KVM's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Proxmox VE rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- KVM: 2–200 employees
- 50%
- Proxmox VE: 2–200 employees
- 56%
- KVM: 1,000+ employees
- 29%
- Proxmox VE: 1,000+ employees
- 20%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.9 · 1.9
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | KVM | share | Proxmox VE | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 4 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 38 | 7% | 47 | 8% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 108 | 20% | 117 | 21% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 124 | 23% | 147 | 26% | Proxmox VE |
| 201-500 employees | 78 | 14% | 84 | 15% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 34 | 6% | 53 | 9% | Proxmox VE |
| 1001-5000 employees | 85 | 16% | 60 | 11% | KVM |
| 5001-10000 employees | 12 | 2% | 10 | 2% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 61 | 11% | 40 | 7% | KVM |
| Segment | KVM | share | Proxmox VE | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 327 | 60% | 255 | 46% | KVM |
| Manufacturing & industry | 67 | 12% | 105 | 19% | Proxmox VE |
| Business & finance services | 51 | 9% | 62 | 11% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 29 | 5% | 33 | 6% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 20 | 4% | 26 | 5% | even |
| Media & content | 18 | 3% | 22 | 4% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 13 | 2% | 18 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 8 | 1% | 14 | 3% | even |
| Automotive | 4 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 3 | 1% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 1% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Health care | 1 | 0% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Segment | KVM | share | Proxmox VE | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 300 | 55% | 183 | 33% | KVM |
| Germany | 51 | 9% | 139 | 25% | Proxmox VE |
| United Kingdom | 27 | 5% | 23 | 4% | even |
| Netherlands | 15 | 3% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 13 | 2% | 10 | 2% | even |
| France | 12 | 2% | 48 | 9% | Proxmox VE |
| India | 11 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 11 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 10 | 2% | 18 | 3% | even |
| Singapore | 10 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 7 | 1% | 18 | 3% | even |
| Finland | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 12 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 11 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 11 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 7 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | KVM | share | Proxmox VE | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 849 | 39% | 859 | 62% | Proxmox VE |
| Software engineering | 718 | 33% | 251 | 18% | KVM |
| Engineering (non-software) | 119 | 6% | 63 | 5% | even |
| Sales | 82 | 4% | 8 | 1% | KVM |
| Customer service & success | 53 | 2% | 15 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 25 | 1% | 13 | 1% | even |
| Data & AI | 18 | 1% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Arts media and entertainment | 9 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 4 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | 3 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using KVM →
Companies using Proxmox VE →
virtualization vdi ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Proxmox VE is named by 560 companies in job postings and KVM by 544; 169 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/kvm-vs-proxmox-ve)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
KVM vs Proxmox VE: questions
Which is more used, KVM or Proxmox VE?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Proxmox VE (560) over KVM (544). By website-and-DNS footprint, Proxmox VE (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses KVM?
50% of KVM companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 56% for Proxmox VE. 29% of KVM companies have over 1,000 employees, against 20% for Proxmox VE.
Do companies run both?
169 companies name both in their postings, usually KVM in marketing and Proxmox VE in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on KVM or Proxmox VE. Start free, no card.