Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · plc programming

Ladder Logic VS Okuma

As of 30 October 2026, Okuma is named by 208 companies and Ladder Logic by 276; Ladder Logic skews to companies under 200 people (25% vs 40%), Okuma to companies over 1,000 (30% vs 55%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Ladder Logic's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Okuma rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Ladder Logic: 2–200 employees
25%
Okuma: 2–200 employees
40%
Ladder Logic: 1,000+ employees
55%
Okuma: 1,000+ employees
30%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.3 · 3.3
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
276companies name Ladder Logic
208companies name Okuma
0name both
642 · 689postings in 90 days, Ladder Logic · Okuma
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentLadder LogicshareOkumashareLeans
Self-employed21%––outside top 12
2-10 employees145%105%even
11-50 employees187%189%Okuma
51-200 employees3713%5627%Okuma
201-500 employees3111%4522%Okuma
501-1000 employees238%168%even
1001-5000 employees6122%2412%Ladder Logic
5001-10000 employees238%115%Ladder Logic
10,001+ employees6724%2813%Ladder Logic
By industry
SegmentLadder LogicshareOkumashareLeans
Manufacturing & industry16058%16378%Okuma
Automotive269%157%Ladder Logic
Business & finance services187%31%Ladder Logic
Commerce & trade155%84%even
Utilities & infrastructure145%52%Ladder Logic
Property & construction135%21%Ladder Logic
Technology & software135%31%Ladder Logic
Consumer services & leisure41%31%even
Transport, logistics & rental41%21%even
Agriculture & forestry31%––outside top 12
Public, community & associations21%31%even
Health care21%––outside top 12
Media & content––10%outside top 12
By country
SegmentLadder LogicshareOkumashareLeans
United States17965%14771%Okuma
Canada166%73%Ladder Logic
France145%––outside top 12
Germany124%2412%Okuma
United Kingdom114%52%even
Italy73%––outside top 12
India52%––outside top 12
Australia31%31%even
Belgium31%––outside top 12
Spain31%––outside top 12
Netherlands31%31%even
Austria21%10%even
Poland––31%outside top 12
Sweden––31%outside top 12
Brazil––21%outside top 12
Switzerland––21%outside top 12
Türkiye––21%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentLadder LogicshareOkumashareLeans
Engineering (non-software)48760%344%Ladder Logic
Skilled trades and field service16320%729%Ladder Logic
Software engineering567%30%Ladder Logic
Sales111%162%even
IT operations & business systems71%––outside top 12
Product, program & project management71%––outside top 12
Arts media and entertainment20%––outside top 12
Construction and civil20%––outside top 12
Education & training20%10%even
Manufacturing and production20%64178%Okuma
Customer service & success10%––outside top 12
Data & AI10%10%even
Quality, safety & environment––20%outside top 12
Unclassified––20%outside top 12
Facilities cleaning and security––10%outside top 12
General management & consulting––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Okuma is named by 208 companies in job postings and Ladder Logic by 276; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/ladder-logic-vs-okuma)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Ladder Logic vs Okuma: questions

Which is more used, Ladder Logic or Okuma?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Ladder Logic (276) over Okuma (208). By website-and-DNS footprint, Okuma (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Ladder Logic?

25% of Ladder Logic companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 40% for Okuma. 55% of Ladder Logic companies have over 1,000 employees, against 30% for Okuma.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Ladder Logic in marketing and Okuma in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Ladder Logic or Okuma. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market