Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · plc programming

Ladder Logic VS Structured Text

As of 30 October 2026, Structured Text is named by 206 companies and Ladder Logic by 276; Ladder Logic skews to companies under 200 people (25% vs 38%), Structured Text to companies over 1,000 (36% vs 55%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Ladder Logic's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Structured Text rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Ladder Logic: 2–200 employees
25%
Structured Text: 2–200 employees
38%
Ladder Logic: 1,000+ employees
55%
Structured Text: 1,000+ employees
36%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.3 · 1.9
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
276companies name Ladder Logic
206companies name Structured Text
166name both
642 · 392postings in 90 days, Ladder Logic · Structured Text
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentLadder LogicshareStructured TextshareLeans
Self-employed21%21%even
2-10 employees145%126%even
11-50 employees187%3115%Structured Text
51-200 employees3713%3617%Structured Text
201-500 employees3111%3015%Structured Text
501-1000 employees238%2010%even
1001-5000 employees6122%3417%Ladder Logic
5001-10000 employees238%126%Ladder Logic
10,001+ employees6724%2914%Ladder Logic
By industry
SegmentLadder LogicshareStructured TextshareLeans
Manufacturing & industry16058%12259%even
Automotive269%157%Ladder Logic
Business & finance services187%136%even
Commerce & trade155%73%Ladder Logic
Utilities & infrastructure145%136%even
Property & construction135%94%even
Technology & software135%136%even
Consumer services & leisure41%21%even
Transport, logistics & rental41%31%even
Agriculture & forestry31%10%even
Public, community & associations21%52%even
Health care21%31%even
By country
SegmentLadder LogicshareStructured TextshareLeans
United States17965%11958%Ladder Logic
Canada166%105%even
France145%73%even
Germany124%2110%Structured Text
United Kingdom114%73%even
Italy73%63%even
India52%––outside top 12
Australia31%21%even
Belgium31%––outside top 12
Spain31%––outside top 12
Netherlands31%73%Structured Text
Austria21%––outside top 12
Denmark––31%outside top 12
Norway––31%outside top 12
Bulgaria––21%outside top 12
Switzerland––21%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentLadder LogicshareStructured TextshareLeans
Engineering (non-software)48760%33868%Structured Text
Skilled trades and field service16320%296%Ladder Logic
Software engineering567%7315%Structured Text
Sales111%41%even
IT operations & business systems71%41%even
Product, program & project management71%10%even
Arts media and entertainment20%––outside top 12
Construction and civil20%10%even
Education & training20%––outside top 12
Manufacturing and production20%10%even
Customer service & success10%10%even
Data & AI10%10%even
Quality, safety & environment––31%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Structured Text is named by 206 companies in job postings and Ladder Logic by 276; 166 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/ladder-logic-vs-structured-text)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Ladder Logic vs Structured Text: questions

Which is more used, Ladder Logic or Structured Text?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Ladder Logic (276) over Structured Text (206). By website-and-DNS footprint, Structured Text (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Ladder Logic?

25% of Ladder Logic companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 38% for Structured Text. 55% of Ladder Logic companies have over 1,000 employees, against 36% for Structured Text.

Do companies run both?

166 companies name both in their postings, usually Ladder Logic in marketing and Structured Text in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Ladder Logic or Structured Text. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market