Ladder Logic VS TwinCAT
As of 30 October 2026, TwinCAT is named by 210 companies and Ladder Logic by 276; Ladder Logic skews to companies under 200 people (25% vs 45%), TwinCAT to companies over 1,000 (33% vs 55%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Ladder Logic's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, TwinCAT rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Ladder Logic: 2–200 employees
- 25%
- TwinCAT: 2–200 employees
- 45%
- Ladder Logic: 1,000+ employees
- 55%
- TwinCAT: 1,000+ employees
- 33%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.3 · 1.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Ladder Logic | share | TwinCAT | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 14 | 5% | 21 | 10% | TwinCAT |
| 11-50 employees | 18 | 7% | 32 | 15% | TwinCAT |
| 51-200 employees | 37 | 13% | 42 | 20% | TwinCAT |
| 201-500 employees | 31 | 11% | 31 | 15% | TwinCAT |
| 501-1000 employees | 23 | 8% | 13 | 6% | Ladder Logic |
| 1001-5000 employees | 61 | 22% | 27 | 13% | Ladder Logic |
| 5001-10000 employees | 23 | 8% | 12 | 6% | Ladder Logic |
| 10,001+ employees | 67 | 24% | 31 | 15% | Ladder Logic |
| Segment | Ladder Logic | share | TwinCAT | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 160 | 58% | 133 | 63% | TwinCAT |
| Automotive | 26 | 9% | 14 | 7% | Ladder Logic |
| Business & finance services | 18 | 7% | 15 | 7% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 15 | 5% | 5 | 2% | Ladder Logic |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 14 | 5% | 12 | 6% | even |
| Property & construction | 13 | 5% | 5 | 2% | Ladder Logic |
| Technology & software | 13 | 5% | 8 | 4% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 4 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 4 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Agriculture & forestry | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Public, community & associations | 2 | 1% | 6 | 3% | TwinCAT |
| Health care | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Ladder Logic | share | TwinCAT | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 179 | 65% | 72 | 34% | Ladder Logic |
| Canada | 16 | 6% | 2 | 1% | Ladder Logic |
| France | 14 | 5% | 3 | 1% | Ladder Logic |
| Germany | 12 | 4% | 87 | 41% | TwinCAT |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 4% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Italy | 7 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | 5 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 3 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% | 8 | 4% | TwinCAT |
| Austria | 2 | 1% | 7 | 3% | TwinCAT |
| Switzerland | – | – | 6 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Norway | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Ladder Logic | share | TwinCAT | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 487 | 60% | 328 | 60% | even |
| Skilled trades and field service | 163 | 20% | 66 | 12% | Ladder Logic |
| Software engineering | 56 | 7% | 80 | 15% | TwinCAT |
| Sales | 11 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 7 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Arts media and entertainment | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | 2 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Manufacturing and production | 2 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Ladder Logic →
Companies using TwinCAT →
plc programming ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
TwinCAT is named by 210 companies in job postings and Ladder Logic by 276; 18 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/ladder-logic-vs-twincat)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Ladder Logic vs TwinCAT: questions
Which is more used, Ladder Logic or TwinCAT?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Ladder Logic (276) over TwinCAT (210). By website-and-DNS footprint, TwinCAT (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Ladder Logic?
25% of Ladder Logic companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 45% for TwinCAT. 55% of Ladder Logic companies have over 1,000 employees, against 33% for TwinCAT.
Do companies run both?
18 companies name both in their postings, usually Ladder Logic in marketing and TwinCAT in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Ladder Logic or TwinCAT. Start free, no card.