LINQ VS Splunk SPL
As of 30 October 2026, Splunk SPL is named by 170 companies and LINQ by 306; LINQ skews to companies under 200 people (53% vs 34%), Splunk SPL to companies over 1,000 (40% vs 23%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: LINQ's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Splunk SPL rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- LINQ: 2–200 employees
- 53%
- Splunk SPL: 2–200 employees
- 34%
- LINQ: 1,000+ employees
- 23%
- Splunk SPL: 1,000+ employees
- 40%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.8 · 2.9
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | LINQ | share | Splunk SPL | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 0% | 2 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 25 | 8% | 12 | 7% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 71 | 23% | 14 | 8% | LINQ |
| 51-200 employees | 66 | 22% | 32 | 19% | LINQ |
| 201-500 employees | 47 | 15% | 20 | 12% | LINQ |
| 501-1000 employees | 25 | 8% | 22 | 13% | Splunk SPL |
| 1001-5000 employees | 30 | 10% | 31 | 18% | Splunk SPL |
| 5001-10000 employees | 19 | 6% | 12 | 7% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 22 | 7% | 25 | 15% | Splunk SPL |
| Segment | LINQ | share | Splunk SPL | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 203 | 66% | 92 | 54% | LINQ |
| Business & finance services | 51 | 17% | 32 | 19% | Splunk SPL |
| Manufacturing & industry | 20 | 7% | 10 | 6% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 8 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 6 | 2% | 7 | 4% | Splunk SPL |
| Property & construction | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Health care | 3 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 2 | 1% | 7 | 4% | Splunk SPL |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 2 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 1 | 0% | 6 | 4% | Splunk SPL |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | LINQ | share | Splunk SPL | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 176 | 58% | 115 | 68% | Splunk SPL |
| India | 40 | 13% | 6 | 4% | LINQ |
| United Kingdom | 20 | 7% | 7 | 4% | LINQ |
| Germany | 9 | 3% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Netherlands | 6 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 5 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Italy | 5 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 4 | 1% | 5 | 3% | even |
| United Arab Emirates | 3 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Belgium | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 3 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| France | – | – | 7 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Ireland | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | LINQ | share | Splunk SPL | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 853 | 85% | 41 | 6% | LINQ |
| IT operations & business systems | 37 | 4% | 394 | 55% | Splunk SPL |
| Product, program & project management | 8 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 7 | 1% | 12 | 2% | even |
| Customer service & success | 5 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Healthcare clinical | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 3 | 0% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 1 | 0% | 14 | 2% | even |
| Design & UX | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 83 | 11% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 13 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using LINQ →
Companies using Splunk SPL →
query languages ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Splunk SPL is named by 170 companies in job postings and LINQ by 306; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/linq-vs-splunk-spl)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
LINQ vs Splunk SPL: questions
Which is more used, LINQ or Splunk SPL?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, LINQ (306) over Splunk SPL (170). By website-and-DNS footprint, Splunk SPL (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses LINQ?
53% of LINQ companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 34% for Splunk SPL. 23% of LINQ companies have over 1,000 employees, against 40% for Splunk SPL.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually LINQ in marketing and Splunk SPL in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on LINQ or Splunk SPL. Start free, no card.