Liquibase VS Oracle Data Guard
As of 5 November 2026, Oracle Data Guard is named by 217 companies and Liquibase by 225; Liquibase skews to companies under 200 people (38% vs 43%), Oracle Data Guard to companies over 1,000 (34% vs 31%).
As of 5 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Liquibase's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Oracle Data Guard rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Liquibase: 2–200 employees
- 38%
- Oracle Data Guard: 2–200 employees
- 43%
- Liquibase: 1,000+ employees
- 31%
- Oracle Data Guard: 1,000+ employees
- 34%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.9 · 3.0
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Liquibase | share | Oracle Data Guard | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 1% | 6 | 3% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 12 | 5% | 6 | 3% | Liquibase |
| 11-50 employees | 24 | 11% | 36 | 17% | Oracle Data Guard |
| 51-200 employees | 50 | 22% | 52 | 24% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 44 | 20% | 29 | 13% | Liquibase |
| 501-1000 employees | 22 | 10% | 15 | 7% | Liquibase |
| 1001-5000 employees | 35 | 16% | 34 | 16% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 14 | 6% | 6 | 3% | Liquibase |
| 10,001+ employees | 21 | 9% | 33 | 15% | Oracle Data Guard |
| Segment | Liquibase | share | Oracle Data Guard | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 121 | 54% | 119 | 55% | even |
| Business & finance services | 67 | 30% | 43 | 20% | Liquibase |
| Manufacturing & industry | 9 | 4% | 15 | 7% | Oracle Data Guard |
| Health care | 7 | 3% | 2 | 1% | Liquibase |
| Public, community & associations | 5 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 4 | 2% | 6 | 3% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 4 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 3 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 3 | 1% | 12 | 6% | Oracle Data Guard |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 0% | 7 | 3% | Oracle Data Guard |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 1 | 0% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Segment | Liquibase | share | Oracle Data Guard | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 115 | 51% | 117 | 54% | Oracle Data Guard |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 6% | 11 | 5% | even |
| Germany | 13 | 6% | 9 | 4% | even |
| France | 11 | 5% | 6 | 3% | Liquibase |
| India | 8 | 4% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Brazil | 6 | 3% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Czechia | 6 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 6 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 5 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 3 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Belgium | 3 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Canada | 3 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Portugal | – | – | 5 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Liquibase | share | Oracle Data Guard | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 394 | 67% | 45 | 5% | Liquibase |
| IT operations & business systems | 92 | 16% | 723 | 82% | Oracle Data Guard |
| Data & AI | 52 | 9% | 10 | 1% | Liquibase |
| Sales | 3 | 1% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 2 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Administration & office | 1 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 1 | 0% | 7 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 1 | 0% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Liquibase →
Companies using Oracle Data Guard →
database tools ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Oracle Data Guard is named by 217 companies in job postings and Liquibase by 225; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 5 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/liquibase-vs-oracle-data-guard)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Liquibase vs Oracle Data Guard: questions
Which is more used, Liquibase or Oracle Data Guard?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Liquibase (225) over Oracle Data Guard (217). By website-and-DNS footprint, Oracle Data Guard (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Liquibase?
38% of Liquibase companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 43% for Oracle Data Guard. 31% of Liquibase companies have over 1,000 employees, against 34% for Oracle Data Guard.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Liquibase in marketing and Oracle Data Guard in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Liquibase or Oracle Data Guard. Start free, no card.