Liquibase VS Oracle RMAN
As of 4 November 2026, Oracle RMAN is named by 190 companies and Liquibase by 227; Liquibase skews to companies under 200 people (38% vs 42%), Oracle RMAN to companies over 1,000 (33% vs 32%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Liquibase's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Oracle RMAN rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Liquibase: 2–200 employees
- 38%
- Oracle RMAN: 2–200 employees
- 42%
- Liquibase: 1,000+ employees
- 32%
- Oracle RMAN: 1,000+ employees
- 33%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.9 · 2.6
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Liquibase | share | Oracle RMAN | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 1% | 5 | 3% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 12 | 5% | 6 | 3% | Liquibase |
| 11-50 employees | 24 | 11% | 30 | 16% | Oracle RMAN |
| 51-200 employees | 50 | 22% | 44 | 23% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 43 | 19% | 29 | 15% | Liquibase |
| 501-1000 employees | 22 | 10% | 14 | 7% | Liquibase |
| 1001-5000 employees | 36 | 16% | 29 | 15% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 15 | 7% | 10 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 22 | 10% | 23 | 12% | Oracle RMAN |
| Segment | Liquibase | share | Oracle RMAN | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 120 | 53% | 107 | 56% | Oracle RMAN |
| Business & finance services | 70 | 31% | 36 | 19% | Liquibase |
| Manufacturing & industry | 9 | 4% | 12 | 6% | Oracle RMAN |
| Health care | 7 | 3% | 2 | 1% | Liquibase |
| Public, community & associations | 5 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 4 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 4 | 2% | 7 | 4% | even |
| Automotive | 3 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 3 | 1% | 9 | 5% | Oracle RMAN |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 0% | 5 | 3% | Oracle RMAN |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 1 | 0% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Liquibase | share | Oracle RMAN | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 115 | 51% | 99 | 52% | even |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 7% | 10 | 5% | even |
| Germany | 13 | 6% | 5 | 3% | Liquibase |
| France | 11 | 5% | 10 | 5% | even |
| India | 8 | 4% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Brazil | 6 | 3% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Czechia | 6 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 6 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 5 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 3 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Italy | – | – | 5 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Portugal | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| EG | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Liquibase | share | Oracle RMAN | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 388 | 67% | 42 | 6% | Liquibase |
| IT operations & business systems | 91 | 16% | 603 | 82% | Oracle RMAN |
| Data & AI | 51 | 9% | 6 | 1% | Liquibase |
| Sales | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | 1 | 0% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 1 | 0% | 5 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 1 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Liquibase →
Companies using Oracle RMAN →
database tools ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Oracle RMAN is named by 190 companies in job postings and Liquibase by 227; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/liquibase-vs-oracle-rman)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Liquibase vs Oracle RMAN: questions
Which is more used, Liquibase or Oracle RMAN?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Liquibase (227) over Oracle RMAN (190). By website-and-DNS footprint, Oracle RMAN (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Liquibase?
38% of Liquibase companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 42% for Oracle RMAN. 32% of Liquibase companies have over 1,000 employees, against 33% for Oracle RMAN.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Liquibase in marketing and Oracle RMAN in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Liquibase or Oracle RMAN. Start free, no card.