LiteLLM VS ONNX Runtime
As of 30 October 2026, ONNX Runtime is named by 146 companies and LiteLLM by 130; LiteLLM skews to companies under 200 people (31% vs 55%), ONNX Runtime to companies over 1,000 (25% vs 34%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: LiteLLM's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, ONNX Runtime rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- LiteLLM: 2–200 employees
- 31%
- ONNX Runtime: 2–200 employees
- 55%
- LiteLLM: 1,000+ employees
- 34%
- ONNX Runtime: 1,000+ employees
- 25%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.6 · 2.4
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | LiteLLM | share | ONNX Runtime | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 6 | 5% | 22 | 15% | ONNX Runtime |
| 11-50 employees | 13 | 10% | 30 | 21% | ONNX Runtime |
| 51-200 employees | 21 | 16% | 29 | 20% | ONNX Runtime |
| 201-500 employees | 24 | 18% | 12 | 8% | LiteLLM |
| 501-1000 employees | 22 | 17% | 12 | 8% | LiteLLM |
| 1001-5000 employees | 26 | 20% | 15 | 10% | LiteLLM |
| 5001-10000 employees | 9 | 7% | 7 | 5% | LiteLLM |
| 10,001+ employees | 9 | 7% | 15 | 10% | ONNX Runtime |
| Self-employed | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | LiteLLM | share | ONNX Runtime | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 63 | 48% | 69 | 47% | even |
| Business & finance services | 24 | 18% | 14 | 10% | LiteLLM |
| Media & content | 12 | 9% | 5 | 3% | LiteLLM |
| Manufacturing & industry | 7 | 5% | 38 | 26% | ONNX Runtime |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 6 | 5% | 2 | 1% | LiteLLM |
| Commerce & trade | 4 | 3% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 4 | 3% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 4 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | 1 | 1% | 6 | 4% | ONNX Runtime |
| Property & construction | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | LiteLLM | share | ONNX Runtime | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 76 | 58% | 103 | 71% | ONNX Runtime |
| France | 8 | 6% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 7 | 5% | 4 | 3% | LiteLLM |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 5% | 9 | 6% | even |
| Australia | 5 | 4% | 2 | 1% | LiteLLM |
| Austria | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Canada | 2 | 2% | 7 | 5% | ONNX Runtime |
| Spain | 2 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Finland | 2 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 5 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| TH | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | LiteLLM | share | ONNX Runtime | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 213 | 49% | 262 | 58% | ONNX Runtime |
| Software engineering | 134 | 31% | 88 | 19% | LiteLLM |
| IT operations & business systems | 19 | 4% | 7 | 2% | LiteLLM |
| Customer service & success | 8 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 8 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 6 | 1% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 3 | 1% | 16 | 4% | ONNX Runtime |
| Design & UX | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using LiteLLM →
Companies using ONNX Runtime →
model serving gateways ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
ONNX Runtime is named by 146 companies in job postings and LiteLLM by 130; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/litellm-vs-onnx-runtime)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
LiteLLM vs ONNX Runtime: questions
Which is more used, LiteLLM or ONNX Runtime?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, ONNX Runtime (146) over LiteLLM (130). By website-and-DNS footprint, ONNX Runtime (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses LiteLLM?
31% of LiteLLM companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 55% for ONNX Runtime. 34% of LiteLLM companies have over 1,000 employees, against 25% for ONNX Runtime.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually LiteLLM in marketing and ONNX Runtime in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on LiteLLM or ONNX Runtime. Start free, no card.