LPILE VS Tekla Structures
As of 30 October 2026, Tekla Structures is named by 165 companies and LPILE by 132; LPILE skews to companies under 200 people (22% vs 47%), Tekla Structures to companies over 1,000 (30% vs 48%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: LPILE's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Tekla Structures rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- LPILE: 2–200 employees
- 22%
- Tekla Structures: 2–200 employees
- 47%
- LPILE: 1,000+ employees
- 48%
- Tekla Structures: 1,000+ employees
- 30%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 5.4 · 2.2
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | LPILE | share | Tekla Structures | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 3 | 2% | 9 | 5% | Tekla Structures |
| 11-50 employees | 7 | 5% | 34 | 21% | Tekla Structures |
| 51-200 employees | 19 | 14% | 35 | 21% | Tekla Structures |
| 201-500 employees | 21 | 16% | 22 | 13% | LPILE |
| 501-1000 employees | 18 | 14% | 14 | 8% | LPILE |
| 1001-5000 employees | 38 | 29% | 21 | 13% | LPILE |
| 5001-10000 employees | 11 | 8% | 11 | 7% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 14 | 11% | 18 | 11% | even |
| Segment | LPILE | share | Tekla Structures | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 79 | 60% | 63 | 38% | LPILE |
| Property & construction | 39 | 30% | 36 | 22% | LPILE |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 6 | 5% | 3 | 2% | LPILE |
| Technology & software | 4 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 3 | 2% | 49 | 30% | Tekla Structures |
| Media & content | 1 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Consumer services & leisure | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | LPILE | share | Tekla Structures | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 115 | 87% | 63 | 38% | LPILE |
| Canada | 5 | 4% | 7 | 4% | even |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% | 10 | 6% | Tekla Structures |
| Spain | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% | 12 | 7% | Tekla Structures |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | 5 | 3% | Tekla Structures |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 1 | 1% | 12 | 7% | Tekla Structures |
| France | 1 | 1% | 15 | 9% | Tekla Structures |
| Poland | – | – | 7 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 5 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Portugal | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Ireland | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | LPILE | share | Tekla Structures | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 866 | 93% | 328 | 66% | LPILE |
| Construction and civil | 28 | 3% | 30 | 6% | Tekla Structures |
| Research and science | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 1 | 0% | 17 | 3% | Tekla Structures |
| Sales | – | – | 10 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Arts media and entertainment | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Facilities cleaning and security | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using LPILE →
Companies using Tekla Structures →
structural engineering ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Tekla Structures is named by 165 companies in job postings and LPILE by 132; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/lpile-vs-tekla-structures)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
LPILE vs Tekla Structures: questions
Which is more used, LPILE or Tekla Structures?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Tekla Structures (165) over LPILE (132). By website-and-DNS footprint, Tekla Structures (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses LPILE?
22% of LPILE companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 47% for Tekla Structures. 48% of LPILE companies have over 1,000 employees, against 30% for Tekla Structures.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually LPILE in marketing and Tekla Structures in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on LPILE or Tekla Structures. Start free, no card.