MagicDraw VS Sparx Enterprise Architect
As of 30 October 2026, Sparx Enterprise Architect is named by 392 companies and MagicDraw by 120; MagicDraw skews to companies under 200 people (43% vs 41%), Sparx Enterprise Architect to companies over 1,000 (38% vs 33%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: MagicDraw's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Sparx Enterprise Architect rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- MagicDraw: 2–200 employees
- 43%
- Sparx Enterprise Architect: 2–200 employees
- 41%
- MagicDraw: 1,000+ employees
- 33%
- Sparx Enterprise Architect: 1,000+ employees
- 38%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 5.7 · 3.2
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | MagicDraw | share | Sparx Enterprise Architect | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 6 | 5% | 25 | 6% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 17 | 14% | 53 | 14% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 28 | 23% | 82 | 21% | MagicDraw |
| 201-500 employees | 22 | 18% | 39 | 10% | MagicDraw |
| 501-1000 employees | 6 | 5% | 43 | 11% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| 1001-5000 employees | 18 | 15% | 73 | 19% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| 5001-10000 employees | 4 | 3% | 19 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 18 | 15% | 55 | 14% | even |
| Segment | MagicDraw | share | Sparx Enterprise Architect | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 51 | 43% | 75 | 19% | MagicDraw |
| Technology & software | 32 | 27% | 159 | 41% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| Business & finance services | 20 | 17% | 86 | 22% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| Automotive | 4 | 3% | 15 | 4% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 4 | 3% | 15 | 4% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 3% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 2 | 2% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | 2 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 2 | 2% | 12 | 3% | even |
| Media & content | – | – | 7 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Health care | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | MagicDraw | share | Sparx Enterprise Architect | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 103 | 86% | 164 | 42% | MagicDraw |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 4% | 31 | 8% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| Germany | 4 | 3% | 44 | 11% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| Canada | 2 | 2% | 7 | 2% | even |
| France | 2 | 2% | 17 | 4% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% | 15 | 4% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| Spain | 1 | 1% | 6 | 2% | even |
| Poland | – | – | 32 | 8% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 13 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 12 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 8 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 6 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | MagicDraw | share | Sparx Enterprise Architect | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 641 | 77% | 293 | 17% | MagicDraw |
| Software engineering | 57 | 7% | 204 | 12% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| IT operations & business systems | 38 | 5% | 891 | 51% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| Data & AI | 8 | 1% | 59 | 3% | Sparx Enterprise Architect |
| Quality, safety & environment | 6 | 1% | 9 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 2 | 0% | 15 | 1% | even |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 1 | 0% | 17 | 1% | even |
| Research and science | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 18 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 12 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using MagicDraw →
Companies using Sparx Enterprise Architect →
requirements mbse ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Sparx Enterprise Architect is named by 392 companies in job postings and MagicDraw by 120; 52 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/magicdraw-vs-sparx-enterprise-architect)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
MagicDraw vs Sparx Enterprise Architect: questions
Which is more used, MagicDraw or Sparx Enterprise Architect?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Sparx Enterprise Architect (392) over MagicDraw (120). By website-and-DNS footprint, Sparx Enterprise Architect (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses MagicDraw?
43% of MagicDraw companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 41% for Sparx Enterprise Architect. 33% of MagicDraw companies have over 1,000 employees, against 38% for Sparx Enterprise Architect.
Do companies run both?
52 companies name both in their postings, usually MagicDraw in marketing and Sparx Enterprise Architect in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on MagicDraw or Sparx Enterprise Architect. Start free, no card.